Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization — John Shaqi
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
backbone of my theory and practice, upon which I feel that I cannot
insist too strongly, is that THE CONSCIOUS MIND MUST BE QUICKENED.
It will be seen from this statement that my theory is in some ways a
revolutionary one, since all earlier methods have in some form or
another sought to put the flexible working of the true consciousness out
of action in order to reach the subconsciousness. The result of these
methods is, logically and inevitably, an endeavour to alter a bad
subjective habit whilst the objective habit of thought is left
unchanged. The teachings of the “New Thought” and of many sects of
faith-healers set out clearly enough that the patient must think rightly
before he can be cured, but they then set out, automatically, to carry
out their teaching by prescribing “affirmatives” or some sort of
“auto-suggestion,” both of which are in effect no more than a kind of
self-hypnotism, and, as such, are debasing to the primary functions of
the intelligence.
I will take a simple instance from my own experience to illustrate a
case in point. A patient, whom I will call X, came to me with an
obstinate stammer arising from a congenital defect in the co-ordination
of the face, tongue, and throat muscles. Whenever X attempted to speak
he drew down his upper lip. This was the outward sign of a series of
vicious acts connected with a train of muscular movements, a sign that
the ideo-motor centres were working to convey a wrong guiding influence
to the specific parts concerned in the act of speech. These guiding
influences rendered X quite incapable of speech, and would, indeed, have
had the same effect upon any other individual who produced the same
working of the parts concerned. To insist in such a case that X should
repeat, “I can speak” or “I won’t stutter,” would be merely to endeavour
to reach a supposed omniscient subconscious self which would counteract
the evil by the exercise of some assumed and separate intelligence
possessed by it. I undertook the case by appealing to X’s intelligence.
Now, strange as it may seem (and I intend to treat this curious
perversion in my next chapter), X’s objective intelligence is not so
easily reached and influenced as might appear. He has formed a muscular
habit of drawing down his lip independently of his conscious control,
and the line of suggestion set up by the wish to speak induces at once a
reflex action of a complicated set of muscles. X has learned to do this
automatically, and at first seems incapable of controlling those lip
muscles when the wish to speak is initiated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account