Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
It is said that the dividing line between tragedy and comedy is not one
that the majority of people readily recognise, and this is also the case
in regard to what is called freedom and licence. This is the danger
which the new democracies of the world are facing at this very moment,
and their dangers will be increased a thousandfold in the near future,
when they will be called upon to pass through that critical period of
re-adjustment which must follow the present world crisis.
In this matter of education I am, admittedly, an iconoclast. I would
fain break down the idols of tradition and set up new concepts. In no
matters do we see more plainly the harmful effect of the rigid
convention than in this matter of teaching. We speak commonly of
training the minds of children. It is a happy expression in its origin,
and we still retain its proper intention when we apply the word to its
uses in horticulture.
The gardener does, indeed, train the young growth. He draws it out to
the light and warmth and leads it into the conditions most helpful for
its development.
And so, in teaching, the first essential should be to cultivate the uses
of the mind and body, and not, as is so often the case, to neglect the
instrument of thought and reason by the inculcation of fixed rules which
have never been examined. Again, where ideas that are patently erroneous
have already been formed in the child’s mind, the teacher should take
pains to apprehend these preconceptions, and in dealing with them he
should not attempt to overlay them, but should eradicate them as far as
possible before teaching or submitting the new and correct idea. I say
“teaching or submitting” and perhaps the latter word better expresses my
meaning, for by teaching I understand the placing of facts, for and
against, before the child, in such a way as to appeal to his reasoning
faculties, and to his latent powers of originality. He should be allowed
to think for himself, and should not be crammed with other people’s
ideas, or one side only of a controversial subject. Why should not the
child’s powers of intelligence be trained? Why should they be stunted by
our forcing him to accept the preconceived ideas and traditions which
have been handed down from generation to generation, without
examination, without reason, _without enquiry as to their truth or
origin_? The human mind of to-day is suffering from partial paralysis by
this method of forcing these unreasoned and antiquated principles upon
the young and plastic intelligence.
The educational system itself is grievously inadequate and detrimental,
as all thinking educationalists are aware, but the decision regarding
the necessity for physical exercise and “deep breathing” in our schools
has added another evil. I wish to say here deliberately that the many
systems of physical training generally adopted show an almost criminal
neglect of rational method, and of the test which can demonstrably prove
the practice to be unsound and hurtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account