Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric PeoplesNadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
History
Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples
Nadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
Archaeology; Prehistoric peoples
Many conjectures have been made as to the use of these towers. Were
they temples in which to worship, or trophies of victory? Their number
is against either of these hypotheses. Were they then habitations or
towers of observation? Not the former certainly, for no one could live
between walls sixteen or twenty-two feet thick, shut out from air and
light. Some travellers think they were tombs, but excavations have
brought to light no bones or sepulchral relics. We can compare them to
nothing but the Towers of Silence, on which the Parsees expose their
dead to the birds of heaven, which are ever ready rapidly to acquit
themselves of their melancholy functions.
[Illustration: 53.]
Nurhag at Santa Barbara (Sardinia).
The origin of the _nurhags_ is as uncertain as their use. Diodorus
Siculus considered them very ancient, and one fact has come to light in
our day which enables us to arrive at a somewhat more exact decision.
The island of Sardinia was taken by the Romans from the Carthaginians
in 238 B.C., and an aqueduct, the ruins of which can still be seen, was
built by the conquerors on the foundations of an ancient _nurhag_, so
that the latter must belong to an earlier (late than the third century
before our era. Fergusson, who speaks with authority on everything
relating to the monuments of the Stone age, assigns the _nurhags_ to
the mystic times of the Trojan War. In all probability they were built
by an invading people. La Marmora thinks these invaders were the
Libyans; M. de Rougemont, in his history of the Bronze age, says that
the curved vault is the characteristic feature of Pelasgian
architecture, which is often confounded with that of the Phœnicians.
Although any final conclusion would be premature, we ourselves think
that the builders of the _nurhags_ belonged to the great stream of
emigration from the East, the course of which is marked by megalithic
monuments in so many parts of the world. In some instances, _nurhags_
were surrounded by cromlechs, of which most of the stones have now been
thrown down. Some of these stones bore prominences resembling the
breasts of a woman.
The accumulations of earth and rubbish about the _nurhags_ are, some of
them, from six to ten feet high. In the lower deposits have been found
coarse pottery, with no attempt at ornamentation, fragments of flint,
and obsidian hatchets of black basalt, or porphyry of the Palæolithic
type, arrow-head, flint knives, stones used in slings, and numerous
shells; whilst in the upper deposits were picked up black pottery and
fragments of bronze belonging to the transition period between the
Stone and Metal ages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account