Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric PeoplesNadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
History
Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples
Nadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
Archaeology; Prehistoric peoples
The long continuance of such a practice is a very interesting fact, and
we may mention a yet more curious one. How are we to explain
trepanations that had no apparent motive on crania showing no symptoms
of disease? How account for the repetition at different tunes of this
operation, first on the living subject and then on the corpse, as at
St. Affrique, Bougon (Fig. 82), at Feigneux (Oise), where Dr. Topinard
has recently made excavations in a Neolithic cave and reports that a
dolichocephalic skull of the same type as the crania of the cave of
_L’Homme Mort_, belonging to a man of about thirty years of age, bore
two perforations, one made during life, the other after death? The
first measured two and a third by two and a half inches, and was
surrounded by scratches, showing how clumsy the operator had been.32
[Illustration: 82.]
Skull from the Bougon dolmen (Deux-Sèvres), seen in profile.
In nearly every case the subjects operated on were young, and long
survived the operation. The knowledge of this fact was from the first a
very useful guide in the study of the subject of trepanation, and
eagerly pursued researches constantly confirm it. One skull, for
instance, from the cave of _L’Homme Mort_ (Fig. 83), had a large
opening produced partly by an old operation and partly by two
posthumous trepanations. The subject had been trepanned in childhood or
early youth. There could be no doubt on that point; cicatrization had
been complete, the bony tissue having returned to its original
condition. Then after death, at an adult age, the relations or friends
of the deceased had cut out further round portions of the skull as near
as possible to the old wound, probably with a view to keeping these
pieces as amulets.
[Illustration: 83.]
Trepanned prehistoric skull.
This was to Broca a flash of illuminating light, and according to him
was in some cases a religious rite, a ceremony of initiation, perhaps
even a custom inculcated by an established religion. The child who had
been subjected to it and had survived—as probably most of the victims
did survive,—attained to a certain position and celebrity in his life,
and after his death the fragments of his skull, especially those
portions near the old wound, became treasured relics, and were in the
end buried with their fortunate possessor on his death.
This superstition appears to have long survived even in historic times,
and a Gallic chain is quoted33 on which hung a round piece of skull
with three holes in it. In. deed, these ornaments were so much sought
after that counterfeits of them were made; at least, we cannot in any
other way account for the occurrence of objects exactly resembling
round pieces of human crania, but in reality made out of pieces of a
stag’s antler found in the Baumes-Chaudes Cave.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account