Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric PeoplesNadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
History
Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples
Nadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
Archaeology; Prehistoric peoples
Brazil is not the only part of the American continent in which we find
traces of the use of this revolting food. In the kitchen-middings of
Florida Wyman found human bones, which had been intentionally broken,
mixed with those of deer and beavers. The marrow had been taken from
all of them and eaten by man. Yet more recent discoveries of a similar
kind have been made in New England.11
We must, however, add that many of these facts are contested. Every
people considers it a point of honor to repudiate the idea that its
ancestors fed on human flesh, and yet everywhere history tells us of
the practice of cannibalism. Herodotus speaks of it amongst the
Androphagæ and the Issedones, people of Scythian origin; Aristotle
amongst the races living on the borders of the Pontus Euxinus; Diodorus
Siculus amongst the Galatians; and Strabo, in his turn, says: “The
Irish, more savage than the Bretons, are cannibals and polyphagous;
they consider it an honor to eat their parents soon after life is
extinct.”12
From the ancient tombs of Georgia have been taken human bones that have
been boiled or charred, which were doubtless those of the victims eaten
by the assistants in the _fêtes_ which have ever accompanied funeral
rites.
In the fourth century of our era Jerome speaks of having met in Gaul
with the Attacotes, descended from a savage Scotch tribe, who fed on
human flesh, and that though they possessed great herds of cattle and
flocks of sheep, with numbers of pigs, for whom their vast forests
afforded excellent grazing grounds13; and though the Scandinavian
kitchen-middings have not so far yielded any traces of the practice of
cannibalism, Adam of Bremen, who preached Christianity at the court of
King Sweyn Ulfson, represents the Danes of his day as barbarians clad
in the skins of beasts, chasing the aurochs and the eland, unable to do
more than imitate the cries of animals and devouring the flesh of their
fellow-men.14
Nothing could exceed the barbarity of the Mexican sacrifices, the
numbers of the victims, and the refinements of torture to which they
were subjected. Prisoners, who had often been fattened for months
previously, perished by thousands on the altars. The palpitating flesh
was distributed amongst the assistants, and a horrible custom compelled
the priests to clothe themselves in the still bleeding skins of the
unfortunate wretches, and to wear them until they rotted to pieces.
Without going back to an antiquity so remote, in how many different
regions of Africa and America, and in how many islands of Polynesia
have not our sailors and missionaries reported the practice of
cannibalism in our own day? It is difficult, therefore, not to believe,
although the fact cannot perhaps be very distinctly proved, that the
first inhabitants of Europe degraded as were the conditions of their
existence, did eat human flesh and acquire a depraved taste for it;
impelled thereto not only by the pangs of hunger, but also by a
revolting superstition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account