Parthenogenesis, in the production of males, has also been found
by Siebold to be true of other bees and wasps, and of some of the
lower moths, in the production of both males and females. While the
great Bonnet first discovered what may be noticed on any summer day,
all about us, even on the house-plants at our very windows, that
parthenogenesis is best illustrated by the aphides or plant lice. In
the fall males and females appear, which mate, when the female lays
eggs, which in the spring produce only females; these again produce
only females, and thus on, for several generations, till with the
cold of autumn come again the males and females. Bonnet observed
seven successive generations of productive virgins. Duval noted
nine generations in seven months, while Kyber observed production
exclusively by parthenogenesis in a heated room for four years. So, we
see, that this strange and almost incredible method of increase, is not
rare in the great insect world.
About two days after she is impregnated, the queen, under normal
circumstances, commences to lay, usually worker-eggs, and as the
condition of the hive seldom impels to swarming the same summer, so
that no drones are required, she usually lays no others the first
season.
It is frequently noticed that the young queen at first lays quite
a number of drone-eggs. Queen-breeders often observe this in their
nuclei. This continues for only a few days. This does not seem strange.
The act of forcing the sperm-cells from the spermatheca is muscular and
voluntary, and that these muscles should not always act promptly at
first, is not strange, nor is it unprecedented. Mr. Wagner suggested
that the size of the cell determined the sex, as in the small cells
the pressure on the abdomen forced the fluid from the spermatheca. Mr.
Quinby also favored this view. I greatly question this theory. All
observing apiarists have known eggs to be laid in worker-cells, ere the
cell was hardly commenced, when there could be no pressure. In case of
queen-cells, too, if the queen does lay the eggs--as I believe--these
would be unimpregnated, as the cell is very large. I know the queen
sometimes passes from drone to worker-cells very abruptly while laying,
as I have witnessed such a procedure--the same that so greatly rejoiced
the late Baron of Berlepsch, after weary hours of watching--but
that she can thus control at the instant this process of adding or
withholding the sperm-cells, certainly seems not so strange as that
the spermatheca, hardly bigger than a pin-head, could supply these
cells for months, yes, and for years. Who that has seen the bot-fly
dart against the horse's legs, and as surely leave the tiny yellow egg,
can doubt but that insects possess very sensitive oviducts, and can
extrude the minute eggs just at pleasure. That a queen may force single
eggs, at will, past the mouth of the spermatheca, and at the same time
add or withhold the sperm-cells, is, I think, without question, true.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account