Proust, Marcel, 1871-1922 -- Criticism and interpretation
Nor could we ever reach that goal to which I longed so
much to attain, Guermantes itself. I knew that it was
the residence of its proprietors, the Duc and Duchesse
de Guermantes, I knew that they were real personages who
did actually exist, but whenever I thought about them
I pictured them to myself either in tapestry, as was
the “Coronation of Esther” which hung in our church, or
else in changing rainbow colours, as was Gilbert the Bad
in his window, where he passed from cabbage green when
I was dipping my fingers in the holy-water stoup, to
plum-blue when I had reached our row of chairs; or again
altogether impalpable, like the image of Geneviève de
Brabant, ancestress of the Guermantes family, which the
magic lantern sent wandering over the curtains of my room
or flung aloft upon the ceiling—in short, always wrapped
in the mystery of the Merovingian age, and bathed, as
in a sunset, in the orange light which glowed from the
resounding syllable _antes_. And if in spite of
that they were for me, in their capacity as a duke and
duchess, real people, though of an unfamiliar kind, this
ducal personality was in its turn enormously distended,
immaterialised, so as to encircle and contain that
Guermantes of which they were duke and duchess, all that
sunlit “Guermantes way” of our walks, the course of the
Vivonne, its water-lilies and its overshadowing trees, and
an endless series of hot summer afternoons.
Is there any wonder that this young poet—and he was very young—when
first he meets the Duchess in real life, and is welcomed into the
select circle of her friends, should feel tremendously excited? But
snob is not the right word.
As a fact, of course, what these complainants have missed is the use
to which this aristocratic circle has been put in the life-history of
the hero. For Proust, like any writer that can be read over and over
again, has stamped his work through and through with his own peculiarly
coloured personal psychology. And if there is one theme that is
being insistently played throughout the whole work (like Swann’s and
Odette’s phrase from Vinteuil’s sonata), in incident after incident,
in the adventures of one character after another, it is that theme of
sadness that no ideal state is attainable in this world, not so much
because we cannot climb, nor even because the ideal becomes illusion on
attainment, but because the object to which we attach our ideal is, of
necessity, not seen as it really is, but always as we long for it to
be. This, with its complement that the mere fact of not being able to
possess may lead to desire even when the object in itself does not seem
very desirable, is at the very heart of Proust’s philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account