Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841Fuller, Margaret
Philosophy
Margaret and Her Friends: or, Ten conversations with Margaret Fuller upon the mythology of the Greeks and its expression in art, held at the house of the Rev. George Ripley, Bedford Place, Boston, beginning March 1, 1841
Fuller, Margaret
Mythology, Classical, in art; Mythology, Greek
So, I said, every human heart shrivels under a curious touch. Love
is angry that we wound him, and if he ever does return it is with
Immortality in his hand. When custom berates, God accepts.
JAMES CLARKE asked if there was not a celebrated statue of Cupid and
Psyche.
MARGARET had only heard of Canova’s, but James said he was sure there was
one older.
WILLIAM STORY asked if it were older than Apuleius, but James did not
know.
IDA RUSSELL said it was wrong for Psyche to look.
Yes, MARGARET said, but her temptations were strong; and if they had
not come through her sisters, they must have come through her own soul.
Everything was produced by antagonism. This morning she had taken up
Kreitzer, meaning to open the Greek volume, but took up the Indian. In
that Mythology which William Story called deep and all-embracing there
were the antagonist principles of Vishnu, or unclouded innocence, and
Brahm, who could only become pure by wading through all wickedness. There
seemed to be a need of sin, to work out salvation for human beings.
EMERSON said faith should work out that salvation. It was man’s privilege
to resist the evil, to strive triumphantly; to recognise it—never! Good
was always present to the soul,—was all the true soul took note of. It
was a duty not to look!
MARGARET thought it the climax of sin to despair. She believed evil to
be a good in the grand scheme of things. She would not recognize it as a
blunder. She must consider its scope a noble one. In one word, she would
not accept the world—for she felt within herself the power to reject
it—did she not believe evil working in it for good! Man had gained more
than he lost by his fall. The ninety-nine sheep in the parable were of
less value than the “lost found,” over which there was joy in heaven.
E. P. P. spoke of the Tree of Life,—which would have made immortal those
who ate of the Tree of Knowledge.
CAROLINE STURGIS said that this probation was what she could not
comprehend. We began at the circumference, and if we fulfilled our
destiny must end by being near the centre. How much better to have begun
there! Why could not God have made it so?
WILLIAM STORY began to say that God must seek the best good of all
his creatures; but Caroline interrupted him by saying that there was
certainly more good at the centre than at the circumference.
WILLIAM WHITE thought all this good, better, and best very puzzling.
MARGARET asked Caroline if she could not see probation to be a good, as
she had herself defined it?
Are we better then, than God? asked CAROLINE.
Not better, replied MARGARET, for we cannot compare dissimilar things.
WILLIAM WHITE asked if any one could be more than good, more than pure.
WILLIAM STORY said perfection had its degrees!
WHITE said, How can you progress after you have reached your goal?
As if any live man ever _did_ reach his goal! said I.
Is there any progress for God? retorted he.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account