From preference, however, these lowest forms of life affect what to us
would be unbearable temperatures. Many of the chromacea live in hot
springs at temperatures of 123° to 176° Fahrenheit, in which no other,
that is, no higher, organism can dwell. This choice of habitat is in
line with the other details of their evolutionary career. For it, too,
is in keeping with the conditions of crystalline growth, halfway as it
were on the road to them; the forming of crystals beginning at a
temperature higher still. And we perceive from it that the passing of
the inorganic into the organic is brought about by a lowering of the
temperature of the parent planet. This again, is in line with the
evolution of chemical complexity. Let the heat become less, and higher
and higher chemical compounds, finally the organic ones, become
possible. That evolution is nothing else than such a gradually
increasing chemical synthesis is forced on one by study of the facts.
Once started, life, as paleontology shows, develops along both the
floral and the faunal lines side by side, taking on complexity with
time. It begins so soon as secular cooling has condensed water vapor to
its liquid state; chromacea and confervæ coming into being high up
toward the boiling-point. Then, with lowering temperature come the
seaweeds and the rhizopods, then the land plants and the lunged
vertebrates. Hand in hand the fauna and flora climb to more intricate
perfecting, life rising as temperature lowers.
We perceive then that, considered _a priori_, the possibility of life
on a planet is merely a question of the planet’s size; and then
pursuantly that the character of that life is a matter of the planet’s
age. But age again is a question of size. For the smaller its mass the
quicker the body cools, and with a planet, growing cold means growing
old. Within the bounds that make life possible, the smaller the body
the quicker it ages and the more advanced its denizens must be. Just
how far the advance goes we may not assert dogmatically in a given
case, since not relative age alone but absolute time as well is
concerned in it. It may be that nature’s processes cannot be hurried,
and that for want of time development may in part be missed. But from
general considerations the limit of the time needed seems well within
most planetary careers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account