Atmospheric conditions far superior to what are good enough for most
astronomic observations are needed for such planetary decipherment, and
the observer experienced in the subject eventually learns how
all-important this is. Under these conditions the testimony of his own
eyesight upon the character of these markings is definite and complete.
And the first trait that then emerges from confusion is that the
markings are _lines_; not simply lines in the sense that any
sufficiently narrow and continuous marking may so be called, but lines
in the far more precise sense in which geometry uses the term. They are
furthermore straight lines. As Schiaparelli said of them: they look to
have been laid down by rule and compass. The very marvel of the sight
has been its own stumbling-block to recognition, joined to the
difficulty of its detection. For not only is the average observatory
not equipped by nature for the task, but what is not good air often
masquerades as such. Trains of air waves exist at times so fine as to
confuse this detail, or even to obliterate it entirely; while at the
same time they leave the disk seemingly sharp-cut, with the result that
one not well versed in such vagaries thinks to see well when in truth
he is debarred from seeing at all. When study of the conditions finally
ends in putting him upon the right road, the sight that rewards him can
hardly be too graphically described.
Next to the fact that they are _lines_, definiteness of direction is
the chief of their characteristics to strike the observer. The lines
run straight throughout their course. This is absolutely true of ninety
per cent of them, and practically so of the remaining ten per cent,
since the latter curve in an equally symmetric manner. Such directness
has I know not what of immediate impressiveness. Quite unlike the
aspect of the main markings, which show a natural irregularity of
outline, these lines offer at the first glance a most unnatural
regularity of look. Nothing on Earth of natural origin on such a scale
bears them analogue. Nor does any other planet show the like. They are,
in fact, distinctively Martian phenomena. This is the first point in
which they differ from the markings we have hitherto described. The
others were generic planetary features; these are specific ones,
peculiar to Mars.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account