In 1858 a wonderful affair came to pass. It was Mrs. Senator Gwin’s
fancy dress ball, written of, talked of, far and wide. I did not get to
attend this. My costume was prepared—a Spanish cavalier, Mrs. Casneau’s
doing—when I fell ill and had with bitter disappointment to read about
it next day in the papers. I was living at Willard’s Hotel, and one of
my volunteer nurses was Mrs. Daniel E. Sickles, a pretty young thing
who was soon to become the victim of a murder and world scandal. Her
husband was a member of the House from New York, and during his
frequent absences I used to take her to dinner. Mr. Sickles had been
Mr. Buchanan’s Secretary of Legation in London, and both she and he
were at home in the White House.
She was an innocent child. She never knew what she was doing, and when
a year later Sickles, having killed her seducer—a handsome,
unscrupulous fellow who understood how to take advantage of a husband’s
neglect—forgave her and brought her home in the face of much obloquy,
in my heart of hearts I did homage to his courage and generosity, for
she was then as he and I both knew a dying woman. She did die but a few
months later. He was by no means a politician after my fancy or
approval, but to the end of his days I was his friend and could never
bring myself to join in the repeated public outcries against him.
Early in the fifties Willard’s Hotel became a kind of headquarters for
the two political extremes. During a long time their social intercourse
was unrestrained—often joyous. They were too far apart, figuratively
speaking, to come to blows. Truth to say, their aims were after all not
so far apart. They played to one another’s lead. Many a time have I
seen Keitt, of South Carolina, and Burlingame, of Massachusetts, hobnob
in the liveliest manner and most public places.
It is certainly true that Brooks was not himself when he attacked
Sumner. The Northern radicals were wont to say, “Let the South go,” the
more profane among them interjecting “to hell!” The Secessionists liked
to prod the New Englanders with what the South was going to do when
they got to Boston. None of them really meant it—not even Toombs when
he talked about calling the muster roll of his slaves beneath Bunker
Hill Monument; nor Hammond, the son of a New England schoolmaster, when
he spoke of the “mudsills of the North,” meaning to illustrate what he
was saying by the underpinning of a house built on marshy ground, and
not the Northern work people.
Toombs, who was a rich man, not quite impoverished by the war, banished
himself in Europe for a number of years. At length he came home, and
passing the White House at Washington he called and sent his card to
the President. General Grant, the most genial and generous of men, had
him come directly up.
[Illustration: W. P. Hardee, Lieutenant General C.S.A.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account