Martyrdom in Missouri, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b A history of religious proscription, the seizure of churches, and the persecution of ministers of the Gospel, in the state of Missouri during the late Civil War, and under the "Test Oath" of the new Constitution. — John Shaqi
Martyrdom in Missouri, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b A history of religious proscription, the seizure of churches, and the persecution of ministers of the Gospel, in the state of Missouri during the late Civil War, and under the "Test Oath" of the new Constitution.Leftwich, W. M. (William M.)
History
Martyrdom in Missouri, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b A history of religious proscription, the seizure of churches, and the persecution of ministers of the Gospel, in the state of Missouri during the late Civil War, and under the "Test Oath" of the new Constitution.
Leftwich, W. M. (William M.)
Methodist Episcopal Church -- Missouri; Methodist Episcopal Church, South -- Missouri; Missouri -- Church history; Missouri -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
The restrictive provisions of Mr. Girard’s will, in the opinion of Mr.
Webster, distinctly repelled Christianity in the person of its
accredited ministers; for whatever proscribes the minister of
Christianity proscribes Christianity itself. The ministry is a part of
Christianity, divinely instituted and authorized, and whoever makes war
upon ministers of the gospel, as a class, makes war upon the
Christianity they teach and represent.
In the light of these facts the State of Missouri, by her military and
civil officers, her conventions, her General Assembly and her courts,
has fairly won the unenviable distinction here announced, the painful
history of which is recorded in these pages.
The ground work of this persecution was laid in the public mind years
before its manifestation. The first out-croppings of the anti-Christian
spirit was in the session of the General Assembly of 1858–9, in
declining to elect a Chaplain, and in the refusal to repeal what was
called the “Sunday Law.” The encouragement given to this infidel spirit
by a large portion of the press of the State, and by many so-called
benevolent associations of foreigners, and from other influential
sources hereafter noticed, prepared the public mind for the legislation,
the military and civil despotism, and the mob violence which authorized
and executed a system of persecution, the history of which presents a
catalogue of crime and scenes of blood and murder disgraceful to the
State and revolting to the whole civilized world.
The refusal of the General Assembly to elect a chaplain, December, 1858,
derives its importance, not from the fact, but the _animus_ of the
debates, and the sentiment reflected by the action.
The journal of the House of Representatives, of Dec. 29th, 1858,
contains the following:
“EVENING SESSION.—Mr. King, of St. Charles, offered the following
resolution: _Resolved_, That the House do now proceed to the election of
chaplain. Mr. Edwards, of Dallas, offered the following amendment to the
resolution: ‘And that the individual members of this House pay said
chaplain for his services out of their private means;’ which, on motion
of Mr. Sitton, was tabled by a vote of 79 to 43.
“Dec. 30th, 1858.—The House resumed the consideration of the regular
order of business, viz., the election of chaplain, when Mr. King, of St.
Charles, nominated Mr. Leftwich; Mr. Brisco, of Cass, nominated Mr.
Williams; Mr. Boulware, of Callaway, nominated Mr. McGuire; Mr. Lenox,
of Miller, nominated Mr. Litsinger; Mr. Davis, of Buchanan, nominated
Mr. Welch. Mr. Ament moved to reconsider the vote on the adoption of the
resolution to proceed to the election of chaplain, pending which motion
Mr. Morris, of Barton, nominated Mr. Crow. Mr. Welch moved to lay the
motion to reconsider on the table, which was negatived by a vote of 49
to 69.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account