The substance of the story was this. The strong point made by the
defence was that Masterman had not been aware of the frauds committed
by Scales. There was no doubt whatever that Scales would be convicted;
but, since the trial began, a great deal of public sympathy had gone
out to Masterman. It was proved that he had been too ill to have any
knowledge of what Scales was doing. This might be called criminal
negligence; it would depend largely on what view the judge took. It
was proved that he had not absconded, as was at first supposed; his
flight to Paris was an accident. From the hour of his arrest, those
who were most inclined to judge him harshly could not but admit a
certain magnanimity in his behaviour. He had sacrificed his entire
private fortune to his creditors, and as for the Brick Trust, it was
very likely indeed that it would weather the gale. The near close of
the war was creating a boom in all business. And then, amid the
general joyousness, there was perhaps a tendency to lenient judgment;
even jurymen were not wholly insensitive to such a tendency.
"Then you don't think father will be convicted?"
"I don't think so. But of course he will be ruined. You know what I
have thought of your father's business methods, and my opinion is
unchanged. But I have learned more charitable judgments than I used to
have. I see now that men may be criminals without the least suspicion
that they are acting criminally. When a man has done wrong for a long
course of years, he gets to believe that his wrong is right--the light
that is in him becomes darkness. He simply steers his life by an
untrue compass, and no one is more amazed than himself when shipwreck
happens. That is your father's case, I honestly believe. He is the
victim of the force that he has helped to create."
"But you say he has not been dishonest in this affair?"
"No, not explicitly--perhaps not implicitly. That is something which
no one will ever know. The fault lies deeper. It lies in greed. A
man wants more than he has a just right to have, is not content with
honest returns for honest work, becomes unscrupulous, comes to believe
that business is warfare, in which the spoils are for the victor, and
by the time he reaches this point his sense of right and wrong is
fatally confused. He does not really know what is his and what is
another's. And the worst of it is that the world in which he moves is
no wiser. He finds himself applauded for acts which in a juster system
of society would cover him with shame. Ah, Arthur! 'beware of
covetousness'--no deeper word than that was ever uttered."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account