Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight itHoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
History
Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight it
Hoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
Communism -- United States
This concept was to undergird the whole communist “world outlook.” Human
society, as well as the physical universe, Marx said, is affected by
this outlook. The principles have universal application. Noncommunist
thinkers, as well as human experience, have punctured many holes in the
thesis; but to communists it applies with the same certainty as does the
law of gravity.
Constant and bitter struggle is not bad, Marx said, because it achieves
progress. In fact, he viewed the whole recorded history of the world as a
story of class struggle. Mankind, he said, has always been divided into
_classes_: groups of people who have special interests, ideals, and ways
of doing things. These classes, he added, have been struggling from the
very beginning of time, and still are.
Marx explained this struggle by means of a special formula, commonly
called the _thesis-antithesis-synthesis_ dialectic, which he distorted
from the philosophy of the famous German philosopher, G. W. F. Hegel.
Here is how it works for communists:
Start, for example, Marx said, with a certain economic class (a
_thesis_). This class is the dominant power in society, controlling
the means of production, the way houses are built, the kind of clothes
worn, and so forth. Soon an opposing class arises (an _antithesis_)
which seeks to overthrow the first class. It has different ideals,
motives, and ambitions. What happens? A fight occurs and soon a new class
(_synthesis_) emerges which, according to Marx, incorporates only the
best of both old classes. (Why some of the bad does not seep in, too,
Marx does not explain.)
Then the process starts all over again. This is history, for as Marx
held, historical materialism was nothing more than applying the concept
of dialectical materialism to society. The new class (_synthesis_) is
now dominant and thus becomes, in turn, a new _thesis_. It directs how
to build houses, who gains wealth, etc., but, following Marx’s ideas,
another opposition class arises (a new _antithesis_). They struggle, a
new _synthesis_ is obtained, and again the world is off on a new cycle.
These ideas obviously are distorted and theoretical. But to understand
modern-day communism, it is essential to grasp the underlying theory.
False as it is, this theory is the spark that kindles the communist flame
This class struggle, in Marx’s reasoning, always produced a higher stage
of civilization. First, years ago, came slavery. The slave-owning class,
as expected, developed its own “antithesis” (meaning its rivals, who
wanted to abolish slavery). A struggle ensued and feudalism developed,
representing the best of both opponents. But feudal society, then the
dominant class, was attacked by its own “antithesis,” forces within
its body which opposed its ideas. For hundreds of years this struggle
continued, issuing forth finally in a new “synthesis” (capitalism), again
representing the best features of both rivals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account