Mathematical Problems : $b Lecture delivered before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900Hilbert, David
Science
Mathematical Problems : $b Lecture delivered before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900
Hilbert, David
Mathematics
In the theory of algebraic invariants, questions as to the finiteness
of complete systems of forms deserve, as it seems to me, particular
interest. L. Maurer[32] has lately succeeded in extending the theorems
on finiteness in invariant theory proved by P. Gordan and myself, to
the case where, instead of the general projective group, any subgroup
is chosen as the basis for the definition of invariants.
An important step in this direction had been taken already by A.
Hurwitz,[33] who, by an ingenious process, succeeded in effecting the
proof, in its entire generality, of the finiteness of the system of
orthogonal invariants of an arbitrary ground form.
[Pg 27]
The study of the question as to the finiteness of invariants has led me
to a simple problem which includes that question as a particular case
and whose solution probably requires a decidedly more minutely detailed
study of the theory of elimination and of Kronecker's algebraic modular
systems than has yet been made.
Let a number of integral rational functions
of the variables
be given,
Every rational integral combination of must
evidently always become, after substitution of the above expressions,
a rational integral function of .
Nevertheless, there may well be rational fractional functions of
which, by the operation of the substitution
, become integral functions in . Every
such rational function of , which becomes
integral in after the application of the
substitution , I propose to call a relatively integral
function of . Every integral function of
is evidently also relatively integral;
further the sum, difference and product of relative integral functions
are themselves relatively integral.
The resulting problem is now to decide whether it is always possible
to find a finite system of relatively integral function
by which every other relatively integral
function of may be expressed
rationally and integrally.
We can formulate the problem still more simply if we introduce the idea
of a finite field of integrality. By a finite field of integrality I
mean a system of functions from which a finite number of functions
can be chosen, in terms of which all other functions of the system
are rationally and integrally expressible. Our problem amounts, then,
to this: to show that all relatively integral functions of any given
domain of rationality always constitute a finite field of integrality.
It naturally occurs to us also to refine the problem by restrictions
drawn from number theory, by assuming the coefficients of the given
functions to be integers and including among
the relatively integral functions of
only such rational functions of these arguments as become, by the
application of the substitutions , rational integral functions of
with rational integral coefficients.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account