Mathematical Problems : $b Lecture delivered before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900Hilbert, David
Science
Mathematical Problems : $b Lecture delivered before the International Congress of Mathematicians at Paris in 1900
Hilbert, David
Mathematics
A rational integral function or form in any number of variables with
real coefficients such that it becomes negative for no real values
of these variables, is said to be definite. The system of all
definite forms is invariant with respect to the operations of addition
and multiplication, but the quotient of two definite forms—in case
[Pg 30]
it should be an integral function of the variables—is also a definite
form. The square of any form is evidently always a definite form. But
since, as I have shown,[38] not every definite form can be compounded
by addition from squares of forms, the question arises—which I have
answered affirmatively for ternary forms[39]—whether every definite
form may not be expressed as a quotient of sums of squares of forms.
At the same time it is desirable, for certain questions as to the
possibility of certain geometrical constructions, to know whether the
coefficients of the forms to be used in the expression may always be
taken from the realm of rationality given by the coefficients of the
form represented.[40]
I mention one more geometrical problem:
[38]
Math. Annalen, vol. 32.
[39]
Acta Mathematica, vol. 17.
[40]
Cf. Hilbert: Grunglagen der Geometrie, Leipzig, 1899,
Chap. 7 and in particular § 38.
18. BUILDING UP OF SPACE FROM CONGRUENT POLYHEDRA.
If we enquire for those groups of motions in the plane for which a
fundamental region exists, we obtain various answers, according as the
plane considered is Riemann's (elliptic), Euclid's, or Lobachevsky's
(hyperbolic). In the case of the elliptic plane there is a finite
number of essentially different kinds of fundamental regions, and a
finite number of congruent regions suffices for a complete covering
of the whole plane; the group consists indeed of a finite number of
motions only. In the case of the hyperbolic plane there is an infinite
number of essentially different kinds of fundamental regions, namely,
the well-known Poincaré polygons. For the complete covering of the
plane an infinite number of congruent regions is necessary. The case of
Euclid's plane stands between these; for in this case there is only a
finite number of essentially different kinds of groups of motions with
fundamental regions, but for a complete covering of the whole plane an
infinite number of congruent regions is necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account