As for the view itself, it has been described _ad nauseam_, and I have
only a few words to say about it. It happened, as it often does happen,
that I fell in with an untravelled admirer of the prospect spread out
before us, not charmed however with it more than I was myself. But he
would persist in drawing from me an answer to the common question--"how
does this compare with some of the famous points of view in the Swiss
Alps?" Such tests I hold to be absurd, thanking my stars that I can
unreservedly enjoy all fair things that are good of their kind. And so I
told the inquirer this simple fact. If, in a mountainous country,
varied, broken, studded with lakes, and rife with all the elements of
the picturesque, you ascend some such superior elevation as this, you
have, _looking down__wards_, a striking panoramic scene, like this in
its general features--more striking perhaps than beautiful, though this
is all matter of taste. The difference lies herein. Here, you plunge
your look downward, or sweep it over surrounding objects--and that's the
end of it. In those other Alps, you add to the four or five or six
thousand feet, below you, as much above--and it is that _upward_ glance
which takes in the marvels of glacier and snow-field and inaccessible
peaks. My new acquaintance asked for no more comparisons, but let me
enjoy myself in my own quiet way.
The walk down Mount Washington to Crawford's at the Great Notch, as I
believe it is called, is rather a long affair. It must be ten miles, and
parts of it are of the roughest. It took me four hours, in company with
two intelligent and companionable young students of Harvard College,
travelling (in the true way) a-foot, with knapsacks on their backs. But
we hurried it too much, especially as the ridge over and along Mount
Pleasant, and some of its fellows bearing Presidential names, abound in
points of view worth dwelling on. Moreover I was foot-galled; and this
reminds me that, inasmuch as I cannot to-day conclude my rambling
reminiscences, I may as well wind up with a touch of information and of
advice. The one is intended for the benefit of pedestrians who make
excursions of this sort; the other for stay-at-homes in flat countries,
who have no definite notion whatever of the ups and downs of hilly
regions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account