Matthew Calbraith Perry: A Typical American Naval OfficerGriffis, William Elliot
History
Matthew Calbraith Perry: A Typical American Naval Officer
Griffis, William Elliot
Perry, Matthew Calbraith, 1794-1858
In this paper war, extending over several months, the officer
whose victories both in peace and war were many, scored points
in behalf of truth and good morals, of the discipline and order
of the Navy, and of the advance of civilization. Heretofore, the
custom of duelling had largely prevailed in the corps, and to
this savage tribunal of arbitration a thousand petty questions
of personal honor had been brought. Yet despite all arguments in
favor of the bloody code, which believers in or admirers of its
supposed benefits may fabricate in its favor, the fact remains
that it served but an insignificant purpose. Its direct
influence was slight in repressing those petty personal
differences which, belonging to human nature, have such
congenial soil in a crowded ship. Duelling was a cure but no
preventative, the killing being as frequent as the curing.
Matthew Perry might have challenged the lieutenant, and, like
scores of his brother officers, appealed to the savage code; but
having long pondered upon and frequently witnessed the slight
benefit accruing from the costly sacrifice of life and limb from
duelling, he aimed to cut out from the life of the service the
whole system, root and branch, and to substitute the more rigid
test of personal responsibility. In choosing the slower and, in
old naval eyes, more inglorious method of correspondence, and
appeal to considerate judgment of his peers in court, he
exhibited more moral courage, showed his true character and
motive, and lifted higher the splendid standard of the American
Navy. To the formation of that _esprit_ of discipline which all
now concede to be “the life of the service,” Perry, in this
episode nobly contributed. He made the pen mightier than the
sword.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account