Matthew Calbraith Perry: A Typical American Naval OfficerGriffis, William Elliot
History
Matthew Calbraith Perry: A Typical American Naval Officer
Griffis, William Elliot
Perry, Matthew Calbraith, 1794-1858
Despite his clear record on this subject, made thus early, he
came very near being made the victim of a political quarrel, and
a reformer’s zeal. Readers of the works of John Quincy Adams may
get an impression unjust to Captain Matthew Perry, because of
the Resolution of Inquiry, December 3d, 1838, “into the conduct
of Andrew Stevenson (United States Minister to Great Britain,
and J. Q. Adams’s political enemy) in his controversy with
Daniel O. Connell, as well as the participation of Captain Perry
in that affair.”[70] To make a long story short, Mr. Adams, in
his political zeal to injure an enemy and moral purpose to
abolish “the detestable custom of private war,” struck the wrong
man. All the information on which Mr. Adams based his inquiry
was contained, as he confessed, in “those published letters of
James Hamilton of South Carolina;” whereas, Mr. Hamilton
regretted and publicly apologized for writing the principal
letter which gave rise to the other two.[71] The whole
controversy is not without interest, and humor of both the Irish
and American sort. It is possible that Perry never knew till he
found his name dragged into Congress, what use of his name had
been made by Hamilton. So far as manifested in his official
record,[72] Matthew Perry’s example, influence and energetic
action were totally opposed to duelling. In his African cruises,
and at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, we find him earnestly laboring to
root out of existence a practice at war with Christian
civilization.
How well he and like-minded men succeeded, is now known to
all—except an occasional hot head in which passion outruns
information. It is perfectly safe for a person seeking either
notoriety or satisfaction to challenge a naval officer of the
United States to fight a duel. One familiar with the “Laws for
the better government of the Navy” need have no fears of the
result. Neither government nor individuals now consider “a
single person entitled to a whole war.”
-----
[70] J. Q. Adams’ _Works_, Vol. X, p. 48; and _Journal_ of same
year.
[71] _Niles Register_, Vol. LV, (from September, 1838 to March,
1839, pp. 61, 62, 104, 105, 132, 133, 258.)
[72] Letters. U. S. Navy Archives, August, 10th, 1841; February,
1845.
VIII.
MEMORIALS IN ART OF M. C. PERRY.
Portraits.
By William Sidney Mount in 1835, when M. C. Perry was forty
years old, now in possession of one of the Commodore’s children.
One at the time of his marriage.
One painted from a photograph by Brady, about 1864.
One at the Brooklyn Naval Lyceum.
One at the Annapolis Naval Academy, by J. R. Irving.
A painting from a daguerreotype was made in Japan by a Japanese
artist.
Photographs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account