Mediæval Heresy & the InquisitionTurberville, Arthur Stanley
History
Mediæval Heresy & the Inquisition
Turberville, Arthur Stanley
Heresy; Inquisition; Sects, Medieval
[125] Goldast, _op. cit._, vol. ii, _Opera Omnia de Potestate
Ecclesiastica & Politica, G. Ockham_, esp. _Dialogus_, pp. 822-30. The
chief conclusions of Ockham are summarized on pp. 396-7; also in S.
Riezler, _Die literarischen Widersacher der Päpste zur Zeit Ludwig des
Baiers_ (1874), pp. 258-71. But see generally pp. 241-77.
[126] See Poole, _op. cit._, p. 277, note.
[127] _Defensor Pacis_, Lib. I, cap. xviii; in Goldast, _op. cit._,
vol. ii, pp. 86-9.
[128] _Ibid._, Lib. II, cap. viii, p. 212.
[129] _Defensor Pacis_, Lib. II, cap. ix, p. 213.
[130] _Ibid._, cap. x, pp. 216-19, esp. p. 217. ‘Nemo quantumcunque
peccans contra disciplinas speculativas aut operativas quascunque
punitur vel arcetur in hoc seculo praecise inquantum-hujusmodi, sed
inquantum peccat contra praeceptum humanae legis.’
[131] _Ibid._, Lib. I, cap. xii, pp. 169-71.
[132] Workman, _op. cit._, vol. i. ‘Wyclif has been called the Morning
Star of the Reformation, but the author of the _Defensor Pacis_ might
more justly claim the title.’ _Cf._, on modernity of Marsiglio’s
thought, B. Labanca, _Marsilio da Padova_ (Padua, 1882), pp. 219 _et
seq._
[133] Fitzralph’s treatise, _De Pauperie Salvatoris_, is printed as an
appendix to Wycliffe’s _De Dominio Divino_ (Wyclif Society, 1890), pp.
259-476.
[134] For this whole subject, see Lea, vol. iii, pp. 590-4.
[135] _Ibid._, pp. 596-9.
[136] See _supra_, pp. 68, 75.
[137] _De Dominio Divino_ (Wyclif Society, 1890), p. 33. ‘Ideo Deus
non mediate per regimen vasallorum subserviencium, ut reges ceteri,
dominatur, cum immediate et per se facit, sustentat, et gubernat omne
quod possidet, juvatque ad perficiendum opera secundum usus alios quos
requirit.’
[138] See Poole, _op. cit._, p. 293.
[139] See Workman, _op. cit._, vol. i, pp. 173-8.
[140] See _Fasciculi Zizaniorum Magistri Johannis Wyclif_ (Rolls
series, ed. W. W. Shirley, 1858), pp. 280-1.
[141] Wycliffe’s _De Potestate Pape_ (Wyclif Society, ed. J. Loserth,
1907), p. 84.
[142] _De Civili Dominio_ (Wyclif Society, ed. R. L. Poole, 1885), vol.
i, pp. 335-42; also pp. 265-74, ch. xxxvii. See also _Select English
Works_ (ed. T. Arnold, 1869-71), vol. iii, pp. 216-17.
[143] See _De Potestate Pape_, pp. 84, 238 _et seq._, 378-9.
[144] _Ibid._, pp. 145-6, 154-5. This idea is either explicitly or
implicitly in all Wycliffe’s later teachings.
[145] _Ibid._, pp. 120 _et seq._, 148, 212, 266 _et seq._ The whole
book is indeed on this theme. Wycliffe does not scruple to call a bad
pope ‘_horribilius monstrum_.’ Cf. _Fasciculi Zizaniorum_, p. 278.
[146] _De Potestate Pape_, p. 272.
[147] _Fasciculi Zizaniorum_, p. 278.
[148] _Ibid._, p. 279; D. Wilkins, _Concilia M. Britanniae et
Hiberniae_ (1737). vol. iii, p. 157.
[149] _Works of Thomas Cranmer_ (ed. J. E. Cox, Parker Society), vol.
ii, _Misc. Writings_, p. 119.
[150] See Wilkins, vol. iii, p. 350; _Chronicon H. Knighton_ (Rolls
series, ed. J. R. Lumby, 1889-95), vol. ii, p. 152.
[151] _Ibid._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account