[152] See _Fasciculi Zizaniorum_, p. 278, from _Epistola Willelmi Cantuariensis super condemnatione haeresum Wycclyff in synodo_. See also extract from a sermon by Wycliffe on this subject, _ibid._, introd., pp. lxiv-lxv. [153] There was a tendency to Pantheism in Wycliffe. See Workman, _op. cit._, vol. i, p. 137 n. [154] _De Eucharistia_ (Wyclif Society, 1892), p. 109, cap. iv. [155] _Ibid._, pp. 189-232, cap. viii. [156] _Ibid._, cap. i, pp. 15-16. ‘Nichil enim horribilius quam quod quilibet sacerdos celebrans facit vel consecrat cotidie corpus Christi.’ [157] _Ibid._, cap. iv, p. 109. [158] _Ibid._, Introd., p. liii; cap. iv, pp. 110-11. [159] _Fasciculi Zizaniorum_, p. 278. [160] See Foxe’s _Acts and Monuments_, iv and v. [161] Workman, _op. cit._, vol. i, p. 229. ‘Of the scholastic Lollards it may be written that logic makes no martyrs.’ _Cf._ pp. 213-90. [162] See popular ballads in J. S. Brewer, _Monumenta Franciscana_ (1858), pp. 591-608. [163] Knighton, _op. cit._, vol. ii, pp. 184-7. [164] _De Haeretico Comburendo_ being frequently enforced from 1401. [165] See Count Lützow, _The Life and Times of Master John Hus_ (1909), pp. 17-62; J. Loserth, _Wyclif and Hus_ (trans. M. J. Evans, 1884); A. H. Wratislaw, _Native Literature of Bohemia in the Fourteenth Century_ (1878), esp. book ii, pp. 181-291. [166] See Lützow, _op. cit._, pp. 47-62. [167] _Documenta Mag. Joannis Hus_ (ed. F. Palacky, Prague, 1869), pp. 347-9, 355-63. See Lützow, _op. cit._, pp. 106-9. Wenzel’s reasoned answer to the objections made by the Germans may have been Hus’s work. For the contest at the University, see also H. Rashdall, _Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages_, vol. ii, pp. 212-32. [168] Lützow, _op. cit._, pp. 130-3, 159-60; Palacky, _Documenta_, pp. 464-6; _The Letters of John Hus_ (ed. Workman and Pope, 1904), pp. 422-5. [169] Due to the marriage of Wenzel’s sister, Anne, to Richard II. [170] Palacky, _Documenta_, pp. 289, 292. [171] _Ibid._, p. 293. [172] _Ibid._, p. 287; _Letters of Hus_, p. 217. Hus does not seem to have regarded the Utraquist question as of great consequence. See Creighton, _Papacy_, vol. ii, p. 86. [173] See J. B. Schwab, _J. Gerson_ (Würzburg, 1858), pp. 482-9; also Creighton, vol. i, appendix 2, pp. 365-8. [174] D’Ailly in Gerson’s _Works_, vol. ii, pp. 949 _et seq._ [175] Gerson, _ibid._, p. 72. [176] _Ibid._, p. 178. See also, generally, Gerson’s ‘De Unitate Ecclesiastica,’ _Works_, vol. ii, pp. 113-14; Niem, Theodoricus de, _De Schismate_ (1890). For full list of tracts, see _Cambridge Modern History_, vol. iii, pp. 867-8. [177] See Creighton’s _Papacy_, vol. i, p. 143. [178] F. Gregorovius, _Hist. of the City of Rome in the Middle Ages_ (trans. A. Hamilton, 1894-1902), vol. vi, p. 606; J. N. Figgis, _From Gerson to Grotius_ (1907), p. 35. [179] See Gerson’s exhortation to the Archbishop of Prague to extirpate the heresy in Bohemia, Palacky, _Documenta_, pp. 523-6.