Mediæval London, Volume 1: Historical & SocialBesant, Walter
History
Mediæval London, Volume 1: Historical & Social
Besant, Walter
London (England) -- History -- To 1500; London (England) -- Social life and customs -- To 1500
The ‘_shopae_,’ or shops, were probably mere open rooms on the ground
floors, with wide windows, closed with shutters, but destitute of
stanchions, perhaps; these rooms being enlarged, no doubt, in some
instances, by the extra space afforded by the projecting and movable
stalls already mentioned: of their plan or structure, in the present
volume, no further particulars are given. ‘_Seldæ_,’ _selds_, or
_shealds_, are occasionally mentioned as places for the stowage or
sale of goods; the _selda_ of Winchester, for example, belonging
probably to the Soke or exclusive jurisdiction of the Bishop of that
diocese; and the _selda_ in Friday Street, to which place, in the
latter part of the reign of Edward the Third, the sale of hides was
wholly restricted. These _seldæ_ seem to have been sheds, on a large
scale, used as warehouses, and belonged probably only to public
Guilds, or men of considerable opulence; there is some evidence also
that cranes and balances for the ascertaining of Customs and Pesage
were kept beneath them.
Before quitting this subject, a few words in reference to the
relation of landlord and tenant within the City, will, perhaps, be
not altogether inappropriate. By an ordinance, of the time probably
of Edward the Second, or Edward the Third, it was enacted that every
tenant at will within the franchise of the City, whose yearly rent was
below forty shillings, should give the landlord (at any time, it is
presumed) at least one quarter’s notice; but in case the yearly rent
exceeded forty shillings, the notice was to be given a full half-year
before leaving. In case of neglect on part of the tenant to give the
proper notice, he was to pay the landlord a quarter or half-year’s
rent, beyond the rent due at the time of leaving, as the case might
be; or else to find a sufficient tenant for those periods. Conversely,
the landlord was bound to give similar notice to his tenant; but in
case the landlord sold the house, the tenant having no ‘specialty by
deed,’ the purchaser was at liberty to eject him at his pleasure. On
seizure of the tenant’s goods and chattels, at the suit of any other
person, the landlord was deemed a preference creditor for two years’
rent in arrear, but no more; the landlord’s oath being taken for proof
that so much rent was due.” (See Appendices VI. and VII.)
CHAPTER VI
FURNITURE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account