Mediæval London, Volume 2: EcclesiasticalBesant, Walter
History
Mediæval London, Volume 2: Ecclesiastical
Besant, Walter
London (England) -- History -- To 1500; London (England) -- Social life and customs -- To 1500
| Ordinances of the Brasiers | 1416 | — |
+————————————————————————————————————————————————+—————————+——————————+
The triumph of the crafts was completed in the reign of Edward the
Third. At the same time it was a triumph which needed constant
watchfulness. This necessity is shown by the case of the rich
Pepperers, who seceded in 1345 and set up a company of their own. They
were so rich that they commanded the Market. A petition was presented
to the King complaining that—
“Great mischief had newly arisen, as well to the King as to the great
men and commons, from the merchants called Grocers (grossers), who
engrossed all manner of merchandize vendible, and who suddenly raised
the prices of such merchandize within the realm; putting to sale
by covin, and by ordinances made amongst themselves, in their own
society, which they call ‘the Fraternity and Gild of Merchants,’ such
merchandizes as were most dear, and keeping in stores the others until
times of dearth and scarcity.” (L. Brentano, _History and Development
of Gilds_, 1870.)
It was, therefore, ordered that in future all “artificers and people of
mysteries” should choose each his own mystery, and should then practise
no other.
What was the power of the incorporated Company? The keynote of the
difference between the Company and the Fraternity was that the former
had authority and the latter had none.
By their new powers, the Companies took over into their own hands the
complete control of their trade. Henceforth the function of the Mayor
was to compose disputes and settle differences between the Companies,
especially in those cases where trades overlapped. The wardens, or the
master and wardens, called meetings of the Livery; at these meetings
regulations were passed; it was the duty of the wardens to enforce the
execution of their own laws. They had the right, which the Fraternities
had obtained of the Mayor, to examine the work and to destroy all that
was “false.” In all matters concerning the Guild the master and wardens
formed the only court: there was no Court of Appeal; their decision
was final. There were certain exceptions to their power; the Mayor
and Aldermen kept in their own hands the sale and the price of bread,
meat, drink and fuel. The punishments were, for light offences, fines,
either of money, of wax, or of beer and wine. For serious offences
expulsion from the Guild was the worst and last punishment. A man so
expelled could not any longer practise his trade in the City. We hear
also of ’prentices being flogged for acts of dishonesty or immorality.
Every man who practised any trade in the City must needs belong to
the Company of this trade. There would have been no power, otherwise,
to enforce their laws. What would be the good of calling order for
the execution of good work if a colony of workmen set up in the City
and refused to obey those laws or to enter their company? It was for
self-preservation that this rule was enforced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account