Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The second or middle ditch, also deep and wet, envelopes the middle
bank very regularly. At present it is wanting on the south side, for a
short distance, having been filled up and converted into a road when
the railway was constructed.
Outside this ditch is the third or outer _enceinte_, a steep bank,
which forms the counterscarp of the middle ditch, and envelopes
rather more than the northern half of the castle. It is about 10 feet
broad above, and is strengthened outside by eight bastions, also of
earth, placed at distances of from 60 feet to 150 feet, and each,
at top, about 30 feet broad by 40 feet projection, and rounded. The
five best marked of these, being steep and about 20 feet high, lie to
the north-west. A small streamlet coming in from the north then cuts
the line, and to the east of this, covering the north-east and east
faces, the bank is continued for about 580 feet, strengthened by three
bastions, which, however, are low, and have nothing of the sharpness
of the others. These latter three have scarcely any ditch, but the
other five have at their feet a ditch, which, even now, is boggy, and
no doubt was once a formidable defence. West of this outer bank, and
ranging with it so as to cover part of the west face of the castle, is
an earthwork of very doubtful character. Its lines are rectangular,
it has a ditch, and it much resembles the early ravelins which were
common in the fifteenth century, and not unknown in the fourteenth and
thirteenth.
Connected with its ditch is a pond, which appears to have been a
mill-pond and fish-stew. No doubt all these extensive ditches were
turned to account, and fed the mill which is known to have been
attached to the castle.
Berkhampstead is altogether a very striking and a very peculiar
fortification. The mound was no doubt an English burh, and, as was not
uncommon, had its own defences. The inner _enceinte_, though not, as is
usual, encircled by a bank, was encircled by a steep slope and ditch,
which, with a palisade, would have been a very sufficient defence.
These probably were the whole of the original works, and within them
may well have been held the famous Council of Berkhampstead in 697.
The two outer works seem to be later. The outer certainly, from its
bastions, must be later than the Conquest, and the middle bank is far
too slight in its construction and too sharply preserved to be of
remote antiquity. But it is remarkable that there is no trace of any
other than the inner _enceinte_ wall, and it is pretty evident that
there was never any other. The earthworks, except the mound, would not
have carried a wall, and had such been built it would have been liable
to be mined and overthrown with very little trouble. Evidently these
banks were crested with palisades, and probably careful cutting into
them would show traces of the stakes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account