Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
Further, it is singular that, though there is a second and a third
line of defence, there is no middle or outer ward. These lines of
defence include ditches only, and not the space which, however narrow,
was always left between the walls of castles for the assembling their
defenders. Here the garrison of the two outer lines must have been
ranged in line close in rear of the stockade, with but room to pass
between it and the ditch in their rear.
It should be mentioned that an earthwork, composed of bank and ditch,
and known locally as Grimsdyke, traverses the high road above the
town, and there are several barrows in the immediate neighbourhood.
The Berkhampstead earthworks are quite peculiar, but the neighbourhood
is rather rich in military earthworks of a circular character, among
which, to the south and west, may be mentioned Bushwood, Hawridge,
Cholesbury, and, at a greater distance, Kimble.
The masonry that remains is all of chalk flint rubble, bathed in a
pure white mortar, and probably faced with coarse flints, picked, if
not squared. Here and there parts of the face remain. This work may be
Norman, or it may be later, though probably not much. The absence of
towers is remarkable. There is no ashlar at all. This, no doubt, was
removed when Berkhampstead Place was built, but there could not have
been very much of it.
Berkhampstead was a seat of the Kings of Mercia, and the place of
meeting of a council of magnates summoned, in 697, by Wightred, king of
Kent; and, at the time of the Confessor, it belonged to Edmar, a thane
of Earl Harold. It was evidently a strong place, for when the Conqueror
gave it to his brother Robert, Earl of Mortaigne, amongst the vassals
there was a certain “Fossarius,” whose duty must have been to clean the
castle ditches. Robert is said to have fortified it with a double ditch
and rampart, and he held it at Domesday. Moreover, under the Conqueror,
it was expanded into a very extensive Honour, of which it was the
_caput_. The manor is named, but not the castle, in Domesday.
The castle seems to have been held by King Stephen and by John, with
the earldom of Cornwall. It had suffered in Stephen’s wars, and John
gave it, 1206, to Geoffrey Fitzpiers, Earl of Essex, who rebuilt or
restored it, and may have erected the present walls. Prince Louis laid
siege to, and took it, in 1226. The attack was from the north side, and
the castle held out for a considerable time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account