Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
“Rex etc. dilecto et fideli suo Godescallo de Maghelins salutem.
Precipimus tibi quod ex parte nostra firmiter precipias omnibus
illis qui motas habent in valle de Muntgumery quod sine dilatione
motas suas bonis bretaschiis firmari faciant ad securitatem et
defensionem suam et parcium illarum.”[1] And not only in the
defences of these lesser motes and fortified private houses did
timber play an important part. Turrets of timber were prepared for
the castle of Montgomery, and even Shrewsbury itself, the seat
successively of three most powerful earls and the chief place
in their earldom, was by no means wholly a work in masonry. In
the reign of Edward I. the jurors appointed to report upon the
condition of the castle, state: “Quod unus magnus turris ligneus
qui edificatur in castro Salop corruit in terram tempore domini
Uriani de St. Petro tunc vice comitis et meremium ejusdem turris
tempore suo et temporibus aliorum vice comitum preterea existencium
ita consummatur et destruitur quod nichil de illo remansit in
magnum dampnum domini Regis et deterioracionem ejusdem castri.”
In a French charter of 1329 occurs, “Premierement le motte et les
fossez d’entour le motte de Maiex,” and in 1331, “Le motte de mon
Manoir de Caieux et les fossez entour.” It appears, then, that
from an early period, certainly from the ninth century, it was a
common practice in constructing a strong place, whether a private
dwelling or a military post, to place it upon the summit of a
mound, and to surround both the mound and an appended enclosure
with defences of earth, and that in many, probably for some time
in all, cases the building within and the defences around such
places were of timber, and indeed, so far as they stood on made
ground, necessarily so. Sometimes probably, when the front was
more extended, as when a small pasture ground attached to the main
fortress was to be protected from sudden assaults, recourse was had
to a “haia” or “clausura.”
In viewing one of these moated mounds we have only to imagine a central
timber house on the top of the mound, built of half trunks of trees
set upright between two waling pieces at the top and bottom, like the
old church at Greensted, with a close paling around it along the edge
of the table top, perhaps a second line at its base, and a third along
the outer edge of the ditch, and others not so strong upon the edges of
the outer courts, with bridges of planks across the ditches, and huts
of “wattle and dab” or of timber within the enclosures, and we shall
have a very fair idea of a fortified dwelling of a thane or franklin in
England, or of the corresponding classes in Normandy from the eighth or
ninth centuries down to the date of the Norman Conquest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account