Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
Although the personal attention of the Conqueror was necessarily
confined to the chief cities and central towns of England, to Exeter,
Gloucester, Nottingham, Lincoln, York, or Durham, his western frontier
was not neglected, although he was obliged to depute its ordinary
defence to others. The Welsh, hardened by centuries of constant
warfare, held with tenacity their strip of mountain land between Offa’s
Dyke and the sea, and were ever on the watch to spoil that other
more fertile tract which lay between the Dyke and the Severn and the
Dee, known as the March. Foremost among the barons of the March were
Roger of Montgomery and Hugh D’Avranches, Earl of Chester, to whom
later generations gave the surname of the “Wolf.” The _caput_ of this
latter earldom, protected by the deep and rapid Dee, was posted at
one angle of the old Roman enclosure; and the castle of Earl Roger,
girdled by the convolutions of the Severn, was an almost impregnable
citadel. From these fortresses these great earls exercised more than
regal power over the counties of Salop and Hereford, composing the
Middle March. The border barons, their feudatories, succeeded to no
peaceful heritage; but by degrees they possessed themselves of the
older English possessions upon the border, and along with them of
the fortresses by which in Mercian times the Welsh had been held so
long at bay. That these were numerous is evident from the remains of
their earthworks; and that they were strong and well held against
the Welsh is evident from the English names along and beyond the
frontier. “Domesday,” however, though compiled after Earl Roger had
held the Earldom of Shrewsbury about twelve years, only mentions four
castles upon his border,—Oswestry, Montgomery, Shrewsbury, and Stanton
or Castle Holgate, and the Earl’s house at Quatford. Bridgenorth and
Carreghova were built a few years later, in the reign of Rufus; but
Bridgenorth represented the burgh of Æthelflæda, the remains of which
are possibly seen at Oldbury, as are earthworks of still stronger
type, actually employed by Earl Roger at Quatford. Besides these,
Wattlesborough and Clun exhibit rectangular Norman keeps; and eleven
or twelve more castles in those districts are mentioned in records as
early as the reign of Henry I. Altogether, by the close of the twelfth
century there were from fifty to sixty castles in the county of Salop
alone. Now, although the masonry of these castles, or of such of them
as remain, can very rarely indeed be attributed to the Norman period,
the earthworks show that they existed as fortresses long before that
time; and it seems, therefore, certain that here, as in other parts of
England, Earl Roger and his barons made the most of such works as they
found ready to their hands; and this applies equally to the Palatinate
of Chester and to the southern Marches, where also Norman castles took
the place, with more or less of interval, of strongholds of the English
type.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account