Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
In the midst of this critical state of affairs, Henry landed at
Southampton in July, 1174, with his prisoners, whom he sent to Devizes.
His arrival coincided with a sudden and material improvement in the
state of his affairs. While Henry was engaged in an act of penance at
Becket’s tomb, William, King of Scots, was taken before Alnwick. After
a short illness in London, Henry went to Huntingdon in time to receive
the surrender of the castle, and thence to Framlingham, which, with
Bungay, was surrendered to him by Hugh Bigot. Prince Rhys, then in
alliance with Henry, besieged and took Tutbury, and the Mowbray castle
of Malzeard was also taken. At Northampton, in July, Henry received the
submission of the Bishop of Durham, with the castles of Durham, Norham,
and Northallerton. Thirsk Castle was given up by Roger de Mowbray;
Tutbury and Driffield by Earl Ferrars, with Leicester, Mount Sorrell,
and Groby.
Henry’s success was complete; but the rebellion showed how dangerous
were the great castles to public order, and how necessary it was to
dismantle a large number of them, and to keep the rest, as far as
possible, in the hands of the Crown. This policy he continued to act
upon to the end of his reign, treating all conquered rebels with great
clemency as regarded their persons and their estates, but retaining
their castles in his own hands. Even Richard de Lacy, to whom the
hundred of Ongar was granted in 1174, was not allowed to retain the
castle.
In May, 1175, Henry was in England, and in June received the surrender
of Bristol Castle from William, Earl of Gloucester. In January, 1176,
was held the council at Northampton, at which the kingdom was divided
into six circuits, with three justiciaries for each circuit. Among the
edicts which they were to enforce were those relating to castles. A
strict inquisition was to be made into the tenure by castle-guard, and
how far its duties were discharged.
It does not appear to what extent the new regulations were carried out;
but the general effect of the new system was to check marauders, and to
render insurrections more difficult and less frequent. Northallerton,
more than once dismantled, was at last (1177) entirely destroyed; and
the Bishop of Durham, its owner, had to pay a fine of a thousand marcs
for his share in the last rebellion. Such castles as Durham, Norham,
and Scarborough, which it was expedient to preserve, were attached to
the Crown, and placed in the hands of faithful castellans. Bamburgh
was entrusted to William de Stuteville, and Norham to William de
Neville, Scarborough to the Archbishop of York, Berwick to Geoffrey de
Neville, and Durham to Roger de Coniers. The assize of arms, by which,
in 1180, it became the duty of each freeholder to provide himself with
arms and armour according to his means and condition, rendered the
commonalty more capable of resisting tyranny, and on the whole tended
to strengthen the hands of any not very unpopular sovereign against the
barons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account