Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
It will thus be seen that Lincoln Castle, as regards its earthworks,
belongs to that type of English fortress in which the mound has its
proper ditch, and is placed on one side of an appended area, also with
its bank and ditch. The general area, which at Windsor, Arundel, and
Berkhampstead is oblong, to suit the contour of the ground, is here,
as at Tonbridge, Tickhill, and Clare, where the ground is not strongly
marked, nearer to a more solid figure, of which, in this case, two
sides and the contained angle are governed by the line of the old Roman
wall. In general, these fortresses are much alike, and all belong
to that class of burhs known to have been thrown up by the English
in the ninth and tenth centuries, and at about the same time by the
Scandinavian settlers in Normandy. Two mounds, though not unknown,
are uncommon. At Lewes there are two, one at each end of an oblong
enclosure. At Hereford, besides the keep mound, now removed, there is
a mass of earth at the north-east corner of the outer area, a part of
the bank, and at Cardiff also, besides the keep mound, are two masses
of earth upon the north-east and south-east corners of the enclosure,
forming, which there the keep mound does not, a part of the bank. Such
subordinate mounds are not uncommon in earthworks of all ages, and
are totally distinct from the grand isolated moated mound which gives
character to the earthworks of the ninth and tenth centuries, both in
England and Normandy.
[Illustration: PLAN OF LINCOLN CASTLE.
Wyman & Sons, Gᵗ. Queen Sᵗ. London.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account