Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
When, in 1068, the Conqueror marched from York to Cambridge, he paused
at Lincoln, even then a very important place, fenced in and populous,
not indeed as yet boasting a minster, but numbering 1,150 inhabited
houses, a leading member of the famous Danish civic confederation, and
governed by twelve lawmen, who wielded powers elsewhere exercised by
the territorial lords. As he traversed the intrenchment that covered
the northern front, and entered the city through the strong Roman
gateway, still in use, he could not but appreciate the strength and
importance of the place, of which he seems to have been allowed to
take peaceable possession. Here, as at York and Cambridge, he at once
ordered the English stronghold to be converted into a Norman castle.
What was the precise condition of the existing work, or what was
immediately executed in obedience to William’s order, we do not know;
there were, of course, defences, probably of timber, along the crest
of the banks, and upon the summit of the mound, but whether William
merely directed these to be strengthened, or had them replaced by walls
such as were coming into use in Normandy, does not appear; probably
the former: as time pressed, and there was much work of the same kind
to execute all over England, it was important to secure an immediate
shelter for the Norman garrison. That the 166 houses which, we learn
from Domesday, were destroyed to make way for Lincoln Castle were not
removed to allow of the extension of its area is certain, for the
Norman walls stand upon the English banks. It is probable that, during
the long and prosperous reign of the Confessor, houses had been allowed
to be built upon the slopes and glacis of the ditch, and, perhaps,
actually within the fortress. This, of course, could not be tolerated,
and is probably the removal recorded. But, if timber was employed, it
was, of course, only until works in masonry could be erected, and,
whatever the Conqueror’s officers may have actually executed, there can
be little doubt but that they or their immediate successors designed
the gates, walls, and keep of the castles, as these now stand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account