Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The additions directed by the Conqueror to the defences of the hill,
already strong by nature and by art, rendered Lincoln, under the
Norman dynasty, even a more important city than it had been under the
earlier governments. Its castle was the almost impregnable fortress,
held by or for the sovereign, of a very important division of England;
but it was a division strong in its rivers and marshy ground, in its
English and thoroughly disaffected feeling, and open to the visits of
the Danes, no longer as enemies, but as allies to the cause of the
people. Its position, dominating the whole shire, challenged comparison
with Belvoir, which received a similar accession of strength, and
Nottingham, on the brow of which a rectangular keep of the first
class was then in progress; but what confirmed its central authority,
and placed it far above any castled eminence of the counties of the
Midland, was the recognition of the hill as the centre of an important
bishopric, and the foundation by Remigius of the stately pile to which
many succeeding centuries have added beauty and grandeur.
The castle long remained a part of the demesne of the Crown but was
administered by constables, whose office was, at times, regarded as
hereditary, and, on one very important occasion, was held by a lady.
Always a strong position, it became especially valuable upon the death
of Henry I., when the long civil war broke out between his daughter and
his nephew, and, by one party or the other, all existing castles were
strengthened and an immense number of new ones built. In such a state
of anarchy a castle became a necessary of life, and the bishops vied
with, and even surpassed, the lay barons in their examples of military
architecture. Sherborne, Malmesbury, and the strong and magnificent
Devizes were the work of Bishop Roger of Salisbury, as were Newark and
Sleaford of his nephew, Alexander of Lincoln; and the castle of Ely, of
Giles, another nephew, and prelate of that see. Durham, also, was held
by its bishop, and the Close of Lichfield strongly intrenched.
Of the lay adherents of Matilda, Robert Earl of Gloucester, her wise
and faithful brother, built the castles of Cardiff, Bristol, and
Gloucester; Fitz-Alan held Shrewsbury; D’Albini, Arundel; Talbot,
Hereford; Paganel, Ludlow; Brian Fitz-Count, Wallingford; D’Oyley,
Oxford; Robert of Lincoln, Wareham; Mohun, Dunster; Lovel, Castle Cary;
Mandeville, Walden and Plessis; and Fitz-John, Melton. Dover, much
strengthened by Maminot, was surrendered to the queen. It is curious
that, of all these castles, six only, Sherborne, Bristol, Ludlow,
Walden, and Dover, with Hedingham, held by De Vere for Stephen, are
certainly known to have had square keeps; of the others, seven are
doubtful, but thirteen had shell keeps upon mounds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account