Medica Sacra: Or, A Commentary on the Most Remarkable Diseases Mentioned in the Holy ScripturesMead, Richard
Religion
Medica Sacra: Or, A Commentary on the Most Remarkable Diseases Mentioned in the Holy Scriptures
Mead, Richard
Medicine in the Bible
[16] Speaking of the answer ascribed to Dr. _Ward_, Dr.
_Middleton_ says, _quamvis enim nomen suum celavisset, sensi
tamen hominem e_ rhetorum turba _conductum esse oportere; cui
scilicet generi concessum novimus, omnia_ tragice ornare,
augere, ementiri: _is mihi solum scrupulus restabat, quod in
ejus quidem sermone, nihil plane, quod_ rhetorem oleret,
_nihil venustatis, nihil ornatùs, sed inculta potiùs omnia
nec satis latina invenirem_.
_Hujusmodi itaque scriptorem, haud magis quam alterum illum
(cui neutiquam sane eum anteserendam censeo) cogitatione ulla
mea aut animadversione dignum judicassem; ni hanc potissimum
hominem a_ clarissimo Meadio _ad hoc_ respondendi munus
_delectum; librumque ipsum_ ejusdem cura & sumptibus _in
lucem emissam; amicisque suis_ manu propria inscriptum & dono
a Meadio ipso missum _intellixissem_.
[17] Germana quædam antiquitatis erudita monumenta, &c. first
published in 1745, and inserted in the before-cited volume of
his works, p. 2.
In respect to this controversy, our author’s _eulogist_[18] takes
notice that there is reason to believe, that Dr. _Mead_ himself had
some thoughts of more determinately explaining or confirming his
sentiments upon this subject, in a work which he left unfinished, and
which was designed to have been intitled, _medicina vetus collectitia
ex auctoribus antiquis non medicis_.
[18] The ingenious Dr. _Maty_, who in his _journal
britannique_ (a work not less useful than entertaining) for
the months of _July_ and _August_ 1754, has inserted a piece,
which he titles, _eloge du docteur Richard Mead_, composed,
as himself takes notice, from materials communicated to him
by Mr. _Birch_; to which piece these memoirs are obliged for
some anecdotes relating to our learned author.
However, this literary altercation, did not in the least affect our
author’s medical reputation, for in 1727, soon after his present
Majesty’s accession to the throne, whom he had the honour to serve in
the same capacity while prince of _Wales_, he was appointed one of the
royal physicians, and he had the happiness to see his two
sons-in-law, Dr. _Willmot_ and Dr. _Nichols_, his co-adjutors in that
eminent station.
After having spent near fifty years in the constant hurry of an
extensive and successful practice; after having lived (truely
according to his own motto, _non sibi sed toti_) beyond that period
assigned by the royal psalmist for the general term of mortality; when
the infirmities of age would no longer permit him the free exercise of
those faculties, which he had hitherto so advantageously employed in
the service of the community, far from sinking into a supine
indolence, or assuming a supercilious disregard of the world, he still
continued his application, even in the decline of life, to the
improvement of physic, and the benefit of mankind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account