Medical Inquiries and Observations, Vol. 3: The Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged by the AuthorRush, Benjamin
Science
Medical Inquiries and Observations, Vol. 3: The Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged by the Author
Rush, Benjamin
Medicine; Yellow fever -- Pennsylvania -- Philadelphia
A mode of practice which I formerly mentioned in this fever, consisted of
a union of the evacuating and tonic remedies. The physicians who adopted
this mode gave calomel by itself, in small doses, on the first or second
day of the fever, bled once or twice, in a sparing manner, and gave the
bark, wine, and laudanum, in large quantities, upon the first appearance
of a remission. After they began the use of these remedies purging was
omitted, or, if the bowels were moved, it was only by means of gentle
glysters. This practice, I shall say hereafter, was not much more
successful than that which was recommended by Dr. Kuhn and Dr. Stevens.
It resembled throwing water and oil at the same time upon a fire, in
order to extinguish it.
The _French_ remedies were nitre and cremor tartar, in small doses,
centaury tea, camphor, and several other warm medicines; subacid drinks,
taken in large quantities, the warm bath, and moderate bleeding.
After what has been said it must be obvious to the reader, that the nitre
and cremor tartar, in small doses, could do no good, and that camphor and
all cordial medicines must have done harm. The diluting subacid drinks,
which the French physicians gave in large quantities, were useful in
diluting and blunting the acrimony of the bile, and to this remedy,
assisted by occasional bleeding, I ascribe most of the cures which were
performed by those physicians.
Those few persons in whom the _warm bath_ produced copious and universal
sweats recovered, but, in nearly all the cases which came under my
notice, it did harm.
I come now to inquire into the comparative success of all the different
modes of practice which have been mentioned.
I have already said that ten out of thirteen patients whom I treated with
bark, wine, and laudanum, and that three out of four, in whom I added the
cold bath to those remedies, died. Dr. Pennington informed me, that he
had lost all the patients (six in number) to whom he had given the above
medicines. Dr. Johnson assured me, with great concern, about two weeks
before he died, that he had not recovered a single patient by them. Whole
families were swept off where these medicines were used. But further,
most of those persons who received the seeds of the fever in the city,
and sickened in the country, or in the neighbouring towns, and who were
treated with tonic remedies, died. There was not a single cure performed
by them in New-York, where they were used in several sporadic cases with
every possible advantage. But why do I multiply proofs of their deadly
effects? The clamours of hundreds whose relations had perished by them,
and the fears of others, compelled those physicians who had been most
attached to them to lay them aside, or to prepare the way for them (as it
was called) by purging and bleeding. The bathing tub soon shared a worse
fate than bark, wine, and laudanum, and, long before the disease
disappeared, it was discarded by all the physicians in the city.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account