Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3) — John Shaqi
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
Wherever governments have interfered for the purpose of encouraging and
rewarding, or of prohibiting and restraining, particular medical
opinions or practices, the inexpediency of such interference has
generally been soon discovered and demonstrated. What could have been
more absurd than the attempt of the French parliament to proscribe the
use of antimony,[54] or the sale of poppy oil;[55] or the enactments of
the different governments of Europe to restrain the custom of smoking
tobacco.[56] The pension conferred by the French government upon _M.
Sigault_[57] for the invention of a new mode of facilitating delivery,
in cases of difficult parturition; and the medal which was struck to
commemorate it, were measures not less inconsiderate and absurd than the
vote, by our own parliament, of five thousand pounds to _Mrs. Stephens_
for the supposed discovery of a medicine that could dissolve a calculus
in the bladder. But it may be said that we are reasoning against the
propriety of a practice from its abuse—That may be very true; but our
object is to shew that such a practice is pre-eminently exposed to
fallacy and abuse. We profess ourselves, generally, hostile to the
policy of remunerating medical discoveries, as they have been termed, by
grants of money; although we cheerfully tender our homage and thanks for
the great service rendered this country and the world, by the liberal
support which the government has afforded to the cause of vaccination;
and were the minister even now to withdraw the necessary supplies for
the continuance of the vaccine board, the consequences that would, under
such circumstances, ensue, afford a subject of the most awful
consideration.
According to the view which we have taken of the subject of medical
police, as necessary to the welfare of this country, our attention is
necessarily directed to the Royal College of Physicians, as the only
legitimate source from which the government is to derive its
information, and the public their protection. No apology therefore can
be necessary for the minute research by which we have endeavoured to
ascertain and establish their existing rights and privileges. Under any
circumstances it must be an object of the first importance to the
profession, but at the present period the inquiry would seem to be
marked with a more than ordinary degree of interest, as the anticipated
removal of the College, and the increased attention which has been
recently drawn to the subject, appear to promise considerable
improvements not only in the interior arrangement of that learned body,
but also in their public relations.
His present Majesty has afforded an early instance of his regard for our
principal medical corporation, by an act of favour no less important to
the institution, than honourable to the learned and distinguished
physician who presides over its rights and interests, as will appear by
the following
ROYAL LETTER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account