Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
_Whether they were inflicted during life?_—In discriminating between a
wound inflicted upon the living body, and one which has been artfully
occasioned after death, for the purpose of embarrassing judicial
inquiry, it will be essential to observe, whether any hemorrhage has
taken place, externally, or internally, and, moreover, to ascertain
whether the blood so effused had coagulated. An instructive illustration
of this point is furnished in the very extraordinary trial[15] of
_Green_, _Berry_, and _Hill_ in the year 1678, for the murder of _Sir
Edmonsbury Godfrey_, a zealous protestant magistrate, during the
pretended popish plots in the reign of Charles the second. It appeared
from the evidence of one _Praunce_, that _Sir Edmonsbury_ was strangled
by a handkerchief in Somerset house, on a Saturday night, and after
remaining concealed until the following Wednesday, he was carried at
midnight into the fields beyond Soho, where he was thrown into a ditch,
and his own sword thrust through his body, in order to excite a belief
that he had committed suicide. Upon the trial, Messrs. _Skillard_ and
_Cambridge_, surgeons, stated that the sword must have been passed
through the body after death, _as there was no evacuation of blood_,
which must have happened had such a wound been inflicted during
life.[15] With regard, however, the fact of hemorrhage being received as
a test of life, a few observations may be necessary; it must be
remembered that extensive wounds may be inflicted on the living body,
with but little or no effusion of blood, but such wounds always belong
to the class of _lacerations_, see _vol._ ii, _p._ 123. On the other
hand, the knife of the anatomist not unfrequently draws considerable
blood from the dead body, and wounds have been known to bleed long after
life has fled; a fact which, as we have already observed, has been
raised by superstition into prophetic importance. The orifice of a vein
that may have been opened during life will sometimes bleed afresh after
death; this occurred to a very considerable extent in the body of the
Prince Royal of Sweden, who had died of apoplexy. _John Lees_,[16] the
subject of the noted inquest at Oldham, bled after he was laid in his
coffin; but, under such circumstances, the blood is _never_ found in the
state of coagulation.
If it be determined that such wounds have been inflicted during life, it
then becomes important to solve the following questions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account