Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygieneSozinskey, Thomas S.
History
Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygiene
Sozinskey, Thomas S.
Symbolism in medicine
Whether the establishment of the worship of the healing divinity on the
island at Rome was brought about by chance, or deliberately, is not
very clear. Pliny would seem to think that it was elsewhere at first
when he says, “The Temple of Æsculapius, even after he was received as
a divinity, was built without the city and afterward on an island.”[31]
The abhorrence of the people for physicians is given as the reason for
isolating the institution. The noble Romans had no love for a class that
made a trade of curing the sick, enriching themselves off the misfortunes
of their fellow-men; they were shocked, says Pliny, “more particularly
that man should pay so dear for the enjoyment of life.”[32] There may
have been other and better reasons. The Greeks themselves placed their
asclepia in rural and often insular places. Thus, the great Epidaurian
Asclepion was in a secluded vale, and two very celebrated ones, those of
Cos and Rhodes, were, as the names indicate, on islands. It is needless
to say that there are excellent sanitary reasons for placing sanatory
institutions in the country, and especially on insular sites. It will be
a long step in the right direction when we somewhat unwise moderns cease
to have our medical institutions within the built-up parts of our cities
and towns, and treat the sick, especially those affected with contagious
diseases, at a distance from the well.
Devotion to the serpentine healer appears to have lingered long in
sunny Italy.[33] A bronze serpent in the basilica of St. Ambrose was
worshipped as late as the year 1001, but the precise import of it is not
known. Referring to it, De Gubernatis says: “Some say that it was the
serpent of Æsculapius, others that of Moses, others that it was an image
of Christ. For us it is enough to remark here that it was a mythical
serpent before which Milanese mothers brought their children when they
suffered from worms in order to relieve them, as we learn from the
depositions of the visit of San Carlo Borromeo to this basilica.”[34] San
Carlo suppressed the superstitious practice.[35]
CHAPTER III.
THE ÆSCULAPIAN SERPENT.
It is not to be presumed that many in our day would seriously believe
that Æsculapius assumed the form of a large serpent, in the famous
legendary voyage to Rome; but it is hardly to be doubted, as I have
already remarked, that there was actually a serpent brought from
Epidaurus on the occasion. It is very probable that the Roman embassy
deliberately brought one with them; still, the coming of the reptile on
board the ship may have been accidental.[36] The latter was the case,
according to one tradition. At any rate, there was sufficient ground
on which a superstitious people could easily construct a mythical
superstructure to please their fancy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account