Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygieneSozinskey, Thomas S.
History
Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygiene
Sozinskey, Thomas S.
Symbolism in medicine
The medical ideas of the Accadio-Sumerian were closely related to his
religion; to him the cause and cure of disease were, to a great extent,
in fact essentially, supernatural affairs. And thus, indeed, it has been
among all early peoples. Nor is it probable that it will ever be entirely
otherwise anywhere. The same feelings which prompted the dweller in
Elam, or in the plains to the westward, to formulate his religion and
philosophy are still experienced by humanity. Even the myth-formers are
not all dead. The spirit of all the mythologies is yet alive. There are
gods of fancy to-day, as there were when Ana and Hea and Bel were in the
ascendant. And they are not very different. The _nomen_, the name, may
vary much, but the _numen_, the thing, for the most part, does not.
The science of the nineteenth century has not cleared away from the
minds of a large majority, in even the most highly civilized nations,
the belief that health and sickness are largely subject to mysterious
spiritual powers. They are matters of which the populace are still apt to
entertain preposterous notions. Cullen well remarks somewhere that he had
found even men with trained logical faculties, such as lawyers, satisfied
with reasons of any kind, advanced to explain medical phenomena. And in
truth the physician deals with matters not readily understood. In the
very first paragraph of his book of books, has not Hippocrates himself
said: “Experience is fallacious and judgment difficult”?
However, it is not to be denied that there are many who sincerely and
firmly believe that both health and disease are entirely dependent on the
will of spiritual powers. Doubtless every physician has seen instances
of perfect resignation, on the death of even a near relative, brought
about by the notion that the bereavement was “the will of God.” An
innocent child, cut off by diphtheria, or scarlet fever, or some other
pestilential disease, which exists only by tolerance, with a tearless
mother bending over it, calm and full of the idea that it was the will
of the Almighty to destroy it in the bud, as it were, is not an uncommon
sight, and one which cannot fail to impress both deeply and sadly the
intelligent observer. Impious and erroneous doctrine, to be sure; but,
nevertheless, part and parcel of many, nay, most of the creeds of the
day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account