Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
Hugh of St. Victor’s[13] _Lore of teaching_ (_Eruditio didascalica_, or
_Didascalicon_) is neither a compend nor a program; it is a concise
philosophical survey of education. Though his primary concern is with
what is to be studied, and to what ends, he sometimes gives also acute
hints of method. Book I (_De studio legendi_), a preliminary survey of
typical directions of study, ends (xii) with _logica_, Hugh’s general
term for the Trivium as a group, i.e., for all language studies.
Considering language as expression (_logica sermocinalis_), these are
indeed the usual three; but considering language as thought (_logica
rationalis_), they are only two, _dialectica_ and _rhetorica_. Book II
(_De discretione artium_) expands the exposition to determine the places
of all seven arts in a scheme of philosophy. First the Quadrivium,
then the manual arts, are classified under the traditional threefold
division:[14] theory (1) of thought, (2) of morals, or conduct, (3)
of technical skill. Outside this division remains the Trivium, Hugh’s
_logica_, as a fourth and final group. Though _logica_ may be divided
simply, as in Book I, Hugh now offers a more philosophical division by
function in composing. By the latter we have (a) _grammatica_ by itself
as having no such function, and (b) _rhetorica_ and _dialectica_ together
as both involving investigation (_inventio_) and the processes of
arrangement, and revision (_iudicium_). These two composition studies are
thus seen to belong, as probable proof (_probabilis_), between absolute,
or abstract proof (_demonstratio_) and plausible, or illegitimate proof
(_sophistica_).
PHILOSOPHIA
_theorica_ { theologia (the Boethian intellectibilis) { arithmetica
(_speculativa_){ mathematica ( ” ” intelligibilis) { musica
{ physica ( ” ” naturalis) { geometria
{ astronomia
_practica_ (_activa_, _ethica_)
_mechanica_: the seven manual arts, e.g., lanificium, agricultura
{ dialectica
{ rationalis { rhetorica
_logica_ {
I { { grammatica (scientia loquendi sine vitio)
{ sermocinalis { dialectica (disputatio acuta, verum a falso
{ distinguens)
{ rhetorica (disciplina ad persuadendum quæque
{ idonea)
{ grammatica
_logica_ { { demonstratio
II { ratio disserendi { probabilis (involving { dialectica
{ inventio and iudicium) { rhetorica
{ sophistica
From these classifications Hugh proceeds in Book III to practical
considerations: of studies as training (_disciplina_), of the
interrelations of the seven arts, of a scheme of reading (_ordo
legendi_), of meditation, etc. The three remaining books deal with sacred
studies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account