Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
The appeal of medieval preaching to this common emotional fund, though
it cannot often be measured, can be analyzed often as to style and
composition, oftener as to habit of thought, in abundant documents. Even
in print hardly any medieval material is more abundant—and there are
further stores in manuscript—than collections of sermons. In order to
interpret these, we must constantly remember how they were made and why.
First, medieval sermons are habitually gauged to one of the two typical
audiences. Either they are for the lay folk in parish church or cathedral
(_sermones ad populum_), and were preached in the vernacular; or they are
for the clergy (_sermones ad clerum_), i.e., before synods, councils,
schools, oftenest of all in monastery chapels, and were preached in
Latin.[6] In either case, until the late middle age, the record was
always in Latin; in either case the preparation also, the notes and
outline and more or less of the further composition, was usually in
Latin. In the former case of a sermon preached to a lay congregation
the record gives at most only a translation.[7] In the latter case of a
sermon preached to a monastic community the record is at least nearer to
the spoken word. We can press further, therefore, the analysis of sermons
preserved by such communities as the Cistercians and the Victorines.[8]
Though popular preaching is no less worthy of study, less of it has been
transferred to the written page.[9] But translation, though it could
convey little of the spoken vernacular style, must not be thought of as
involving the difficulties of to-day. In the middle age every cleric
was bilingual; and every preacher of distinction enough to be recorded
not only read and wrote Latin habitually, but spoke it fluently.[10]
His schooling having been in Latin, both written and oral, his daily
offices, his reading, and whatever writing he did being still in Latin,
he used Latin easily and naturally in thinking out and ordering a sermon
or in giving another’s sermon, or his own afterward, the permanence of
writing. Since he would not be embarrassed, as young preachers sometimes
are to-day, by trying to recall phrases and sentences, preaching in the
vernacular from Latin notes might even leave oral composition the more
free.
B. COLLECTIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account