Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
The notion that the citing of “Pernaso” and “Cithero” in the same
breath is meant to exhibit the Franklin as “a burel man” is dispelled
by literary history. Cicero as a master of style had long been invoked
to teach poetry. _Poetria_, as conceived by the medieval manuals,
is essentially elaboration of style.[35] That it is a distinct mode
of composition is never even hinted. Focused on diction and devoted
to elaboration, it draws upon the ancient _colores_ until poetic is
indistinguishable from rhetoric. Either, then, Chaucer is merely
accepting this merger, without particular intention in his “Pernaso”
and “Cithero,” or he is hinting that the very conception hinders
straightforward narrative.
In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the English word _rhetoric_
denoted style generally, whether in prose or in verse. So _rhetor_ or
_rhetorien_ meant master of style, and was freely applied to poets. The
familiar reference to Petrarch, therefore, is usually taken as general
praise.
Fraunceys Petrark, the laureat poete,
Highte this clerk, whos rethoryke swete
Enlumined al Itaille of poetrye.
_Clerk’s Prologue_, E. 31.
Nor should we pause over the conjunction of “rethoryke” and “poetrye,”
were it not identical with that of “Cithero” and “Pernaso.” Even if this
pairing, like that, merely reflects medieval habit without reflecting on
it, the Clerk’s prologue as a whole is sufficiently definite. Repeating
the Host’s term “heigh style,” it goes on to consider Petrarch in this
aspect. The Host had been quite precise.
Your termes, your colours, and your figures,
Kepe hem in stoor til so be ye endyte
Heigh style, as whan that men to kinges write.
_Clerk’s Prologue_, E. 16.
Whether or not “heigh style” is a misappropriation of a phrase of
Petrarch’s, its implication here is both definite and significant.
“As whan that men to kinges write” makes “endyte” refer unmistakably
to _dictamen_.[36] The Host deprecates the perversion of this to the
telling of a tale. His sarcasm is directed not vaguely at grandiloquence,
but specifically at the application of _dictamen_ to story-telling. To
measure its significance, one must read the doctrine pervading _poetria_
and _dictamen_ alike. That doctrine is rhetoric; it is nothing more and
nothing else.
The Clerk, taking up “heigh style,” admits that it is a hindrance in
Petrarch’s descriptive opening.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account