Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-TonPeacock, Thomas Love
General
Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-Ton
Peacock, Thomas Love
English fiction -- 19th century; Orangutans -- Fiction; Satire
The not sarcastic or not purely sarcastic scenes and personages of the
novel have considerable merit, which would be more easily perceptible if
they were not kept apart from each other by so much of the
Fax-and-Forester business. Anthelia has excited interest and admiration
as a reminiscence of Peacock’s first love, and a first draft of the more
perfectly conceived Susannah Touchandgo in _Crotchet Castle_. They both
exhibit—with some modern touches, chiefly in the latter of the pair—the
sentimental but intelligent heroine of the last century. Mrs. Pinmoney
and her daughter are slight, but good, and the former’s list of tastes
is a capital passage, while Sir Telegraph Paxarett is an excellent
personage, showing something of Thackeray’s partiality for making a
young man of fashion not quite a coxcomb, such as the older novelists
had been prone to draw him. Mr. Derrydown, who is a sort of first sketch
of Mr. Chainmail in _Crotchet Castle_, is a very intelligent
mediaevalist; and the ‘supers,’ Mr. O’Scarum and the rest, play their
parts very well.
These compliments, however, will hardly extend to the hero or the
villains, though they apply with redoubled force to Sir Oran Haut-ton.
The quadrumanous baronet, indeed, is such an excellent fellow, that one
almost wishes he could have been discovered to be no Orang at all, but a
baby lost early in the woods, could have recovered his speech, improved
his good looks, and married Anthelia. For his patron, friend, rival, and
almost namesake, Sylvan Forester, is a terrible prig and bore. It is
difficult to believe that Peacock can have sympathised with him, and
impossible not to think that he simply followed the old theory of the
good young hero, as he did other old theories in the elopement and
recovery. But Mr. Forester is not much worse than the villains.
Grovelgrub indeed, though he is much worse than Portpipe (who is not
detestable), and is the sequel to Gaster in Peacock’s curious warfare
against the clergy, has a touch of wit now and then. But Lord Anophel
Achthar (how with that title he came to be heir-apparent to a marquis
Peacock does not explain) is an exceeding poor creature, not much more
valorous than Bob Acres, without any of Bob’s redeeming fun, and as dull
a dog as need or need not be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account