Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-TonPeacock, Thomas Love
General
Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-Ton
Peacock, Thomas Love
English fiction -- 19th century; Orangutans -- Fiction; Satire
One evening we were surprised by an unexpected visitor; it was the
lawyer, my employer. ‘Desmond!’ said he, ‘I am a ruined man. For having
been too scrupulous to make beggars of others, I have a fair prospect of
becoming one myself. You are shocked and astonished. Do not grieve on my
account. I have neither wife nor children. Very trivial and very
remediable is the evil that can happen to me. “The valiant by himself,
what can he suffer?” You will think a lawyer has as little business with
poetry as he has with justice. Perhaps so. I have been too partial to
both.’
I was glad to see him so cheerful, and expressed a hope that his affairs
would take a better turn than he seemed to expect. ‘You shall know
more,’ said he, ‘in a few days; in the meantime, here are the arrears I
owe you.’
When he came again, he said: ‘My creditors are neither numerous nor
cruel. I have made over to them all my property, but they allow me to
retain possession of a small house in Westmoreland, with an annuity for
my life, sufficient to maintain me in competence. I could propose a wild
scheme to you if I thought you would not be offended.’
‘That,’ said I, ‘I certainly will not, propose what you may.’
‘Tell me,’ said he, ‘which do you think the most useful and
uncontaminating implement, the quill or the spade?’
‘The spade,’ said I, ‘generally speaking, unquestionably: the quill in
some most rare and solitary instances.’
‘In the hand of Homer and Plutarch, of Seneca and Tacitus, of
Shakespeare and Rousseau? I am not speaking of them, or of those who,
however humbly, reflect their excellencies. But in the hands of the
slaves of commerce, the minions of law, the venal advocates of
superstition, the sycophants of corruption, the turnspits of literature,
the paragraph-mongers of prostituted journals, the hireling compounders
of party-praise and censure, under the name of periodical criticism,
what say you to it?’
‘What can I say,’ said I, ‘but that it is the curse of society, and the
bane of the human mind?’
‘And yet,’ said he, ‘in some of these ways must you employ it, if you
wish to live by it. Literature is not the soil in which truth and
liberty can flourish, unless their cultivators be independent of the
world. Those who are not so, whatever be the promise of their beginning,
will end either in sycophants or beggars. As mere mechanical
instruments, in pursuits unconnected with literature, what say you to
the comparison?’
‘What Cincinnatus would have said,’ I answered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account