Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-TonPeacock, Thomas Love
General
Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-Ton
Peacock, Thomas Love
English fiction -- 19th century; Orangutans -- Fiction; Satire
‘I am glad,’ said he, ‘to hear it. You are not one of the multitude,
neither, I believe, am I. I embraced my profession, I assure you, from
very disinterested motives. I considered that, the greater the powers of
mischief with which that profession is armed, and, I am sorry to add,
the practice of mischief in the generality of its professors, the
greater might be the scope of philanthropy, in protecting weakness and
counteracting oppression. Thus I have passed my life in an attempt to
reconcile philanthropy and law. I had property sufficient to enable me
to try the experiment. The natural consequence is, my property has
vanished. I do not regret it, for I have done some good. But I can do no
more. My power is annulled. I must retire from the stage of life. If I
retire alone, I must have servants; I had much rather have friends. If
you will accompany me to Westmoreland, we will organise a little
republic of our own. Your wife shall be our housekeeper. We will
cultivate our garden. We shall want little more, and that my annuity
will amply supply. We will select a few books, and we will pronounce
eternal banishment on pen and ink.’
I could not help smiling at the earnestness with which he pronounced the
last clause. The change of a lawyer into a Roman republican appeared to
me as miraculous as any metamorphosis in Ovid. Not to weary you with
details, we carried this scheme into effect, and passed three years of
natural and healthy occupation, with perfect simplicity and perfect
content. They were the happiest of our lives. But at the end of this
period our old friend died. His annuity died with him. He left me his
heir, but his habitation and its furniture were all he had to leave. I
procured a tenant for the house, and we removed to this even yet more
humble dwelling. The difference of the rent, a very trifling sum indeed,
constituted our only income. The increase of our family, and the
consequent pressure of necessity, compelled us to sell the house. From
the same necessity we have become strict Pythagoreans. I do not complain
that we live hardly: it is almost wonderful that we live at all. The
produce of our little garden preserves us from famine: but this is all
it does. I consider myself a mere rustic, and very willingly engage in
agricultural labour, when the neighbouring farmers think proper to
employ me: but they feel no deficiency of abler hands. There are more
labourers than means of labour. In the cities it is the same. If all the
modes of human occupation in this kingdom, from the highest to the
lowest, were to require at once a double number of persons, there would
not remain one of them twelve hours unfilled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account