“I have heard an account of the affair of the images. You
should have remembered, as a Christian, that to insult the
poor is to despise the ordinance of God in making them so: and
moreover, being well born and well bred, and having lived in
good company at home, which, may be, has not been the privilege
of all your schoolfellows, you should feel that it is the
hereditary pride and duty of a gentleman to protect those who
perhaps never sat down to a good meal in their lives. It would
have been more manly and creditable if you had broken the head
of ——, or some pompous country booby in your back settlement,
than smashed the fooleries of this poor Pagan Jew, which were
to him both funds and landed estate. This strict truth obliges
me to say, though, if you had bought his whole stock to indulge
the school with a cock-shy, I should only have said ‘A fool
and his money are soon parted.’ It is impossible, however, to
be angry with you, as you came forward like a lad of spirit
and gentlemanly feeling to repair your share, and perhaps more
than your share, of the damage. The anxiety the poor fellow had
suffered you could not make up to him. And it is well that you
did make such reparation as you did; had it not been the case,
you never would have recovered the place you would have lost in
my esteem. Remember, this sort of thing must never happen again
if you value that esteem. And have no acquaintance you can
avoid with the stingy cowards who shirked their share of the
damage: they can be no fit company for you or any gentleman. I
don’t know what the public opinion of Rugby says of them. We
plain spoken old Westminsters, in the palmy days of the school,
should have called them dirty dogs; and so much for them, more
words than they are worth. I am glad to find that your general
conduct is approved by the Doctor: and now that you have put
your hand to the plough, don’t take it off; and God bless you.”
In conclusion, _to George_:—
“Don’t cut, or look shy on, any of the præposters who have done
their duty, if you do not think they are acting from private
pique, or love of power. This question you have sense and
honesty to decide for yourself. I have hinted to Arnold that it
_may_ be so, but cannot know it as well as you do, yea or nay.
And if you do your own duty without flinching, your opinion
will have weight with all whom it may concern. The Doctor
evidently thinks you could be of essential use to him if you
liked, and I am sure he is much too fair and honourable a man
to want to make spies of his pupils. If you do not back him in
what he has a right to enforce, you pass a tacit censure on a
man you profess to esteem.”
George’s answer produced the following from your grandfather:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account