Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-IslandKnowles, James D. (James Davis)
History
Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-Island
Knowles, James D. (James Davis)
Rhode Island -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
The Protector Cromwell died in September, 1658. This wonderful man
raised himself, from a private station, to the supreme power, and
fulfilled his high functions with an ability and energy, which few
occupants of a throne have ever displayed. He has shared the usual fate
of those men, whose conduct and principles have placed them apart from
the mass of mankind. No other man was ever in a position, which exposed
him to the hatred and misrepresentation of so many parties. The
royalists heaped on him unmeasured obloquy as a usurper. The High Church
party denounced him as a foe to the hierarchy. The Presbyterians
disliked and opposed him, as a friend of toleration. The
ultra-republicans reproached him for his ambition, because he did not
think England, in her existing condition, to be capable of a free
republican government, and therefore retained in his hands the power
which he believed to be indispensable to the peace of the state. The
irreligious, of all parties, scoffed at him as a hypocrite and a
fanatic, though the charge is somewhat inconsistent with itself.[305]
That Cromwell had faults, may be freely acknowledged, by his warmest
friends. That his course was always wise and justifiable, cannot be
maintained; but it may be doubted, whether, if the circumstances of that
stormy and critical period in which he lived were fairly weighed, and
his character and conduct were sifted, with a candid spirit, it would
not be found, that Cromwell deserves more of the applause of the friends
of liberty and religion, than of their censures. It is certain, that his
accusers yield to him the praise of qualities, which it is difficult to
reconcile with the crimes that they impute to him.
It is surprising to hear, from American writers, reproaches against
Cromwell as a “usurper.”[306] This language is not strange from the lips
of a royalist, or a High Church partisan, in England; but from an
American, it is inconsistent, and unworthy of his position as a citizen
of a great and free country, where public opinion ought to be decisively
and steadily in favor of republican principles, and ought thus to form
an august tribunal, whose verdict should be felt and respected
throughout the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account