Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-IslandKnowles, James D. (James Davis)
History
Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-Island
Knowles, James D. (James Davis)
Rhode Island -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
There was, unquestionably, an entire sincerity in these expressions of
attachment to the Church of England. There was, as they judged, no
inconsistency in their subsequent conduct, in forming churches, from
which Episcopacy, and all the ceremonies of the parent Church, were
excluded. Their love for that Church was founded on her doctrines, not
on her ceremonies. They recognised in her articles the genuine faith,
once delivered to the saints. Her ceremonies they regarded as unseemly
appendages, the relics of Popish superstition, of which they desired to
divest her. They loved the inward spirit, not the outward form. They did
reverence to the majestic soul, while they looked with sorrow on her
fantastic attire. They would have remained in her bosom, and submitted
to much which they deemed undesirable, if she would have permitted them
to reject what they considered as positively unlawful and wrong. But as
she left them no alternative but unconditional submission, or exile,
they departed for America; and when they came to form churches here,
they endeavored to incorporate that soul in a body befitting her
dignity. The American church was, in their view, the Church of England,
redeemed and regenerated, holding to her former self a similar relation
to that which the just man made perfect bears to the saint who is still
on earth, and encumbered with his diseased and mortal body.
A church was formed at Salem, on the 6th of August, 1629, when thirty
persons entered into a covenant in writing, and the Rev. Mr. Skelton was
ordained, or instituted, as the pastor, and the Rev. Mr. Higginson as
the teacher; these offices being considered as distinct, and both being
deemed essential to the welfare of a church. The church thus formed was
entirely independent. The Governor of Plymouth, and other members of the
church there, who had been invited to attend the ceremony, were not
permitted to give the right hand of fellowship to the new church, till
an explicit declaration had been made, that this service was not meant
to indicate any right of interference or control. The pastor and teacher
were inducted into office by the vote of the church, and by the
imposition of the hands of the ruling elder, as the organ of the church.
Thus careful were this body to exclude, at the outset, all authority but
that of the Head of the Church. Several of the inhabitants, among whom
Messrs. John and Samuel Brown were the principal men, opposed the new
church, because the liturgy of the Church of England was rejected.[33]
They accordingly formed another society, in which the book of common
prayer was read. The schism was speedily remedied, by a measure which
was much more energetic than just. Mr. John Brown and his brother, the
leaders, were sent to England, and their followers quietly relinquished
their opposition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account