Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-IslandKnowles, James D. (James Davis)
History
Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-Island
Knowles, James D. (James Davis)
Rhode Island -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
“Twelfthly. Lastly, true civility and christianity may both flourish
in a state or kingdom, notwithstanding the permission of divers and
contrary consciences, either of Jews or Gentiles.”
Without examining the numerous arguments and texts, with which Mr.
Williams fortifies his doctrine, we will briefly state the general
principles of liberty of conscience.
All men are bound by the laws of God, and are responsible to Him for
their conduct. He requires them to love, worship and obey Him. From this
duty, they cannot be released. The conscience cannot be freed from this
obligation. God has not granted any liberty to disobey His commands.
As God is the Supreme Ruler, He may prescribe the modes in which He
chooses to be worshipped, and may enforce conformity by temporal
penalties. This he did in the Jewish commonwealth. He established a
system of rites, and armed the magistrate with power to coerce the
consciences of the Jews. The civil sword was rightly used to maintain
the national religion, because the magistrate acted in the name and by
the authority of Jehovah. The destruction of several heathen nations, by
the Jews, was just, because God commanded the act. He uses what
instruments he pleases to punish men, and the chastisement was deserved,
whether it was inflicted by the Jewish sword, or by famine or
pestilence.
But since the introduction of the christian system, the case is altered.
The obligation to love God and obey the Gospel, binds the conscience of
every man; but he is responsible to God alone. His fellow men have no
right to interfere. God has not delegated to any man this authority over
the conscience.
All human laws, therefore, which either prescribe or prohibit certain
doctrines or rites, that are not inconsistent with the civil peace, are
unjust, and are an invasion of the prerogatives of God. They are
consequently null and void, and no man is bound to obey them. The
reasons are obvious:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account