Memoirs of Miss Sidney Biddulph: Extracted from her own Journal, and now first publishedSheridan, Frances Chamberlaine
General
Memoirs of Miss Sidney Biddulph: Extracted from her own Journal, and now first published
Sheridan, Frances Chamberlaine
English fiction -- 18th century
When I had read these letters, my mother asked me, What I thought of Mr
Faulkland? Indeed, I was so astonished, that I scarce knew what answer
to make; but replied, Madam, are you satisfied that this letter is not
forged, with a design to injure Mr Faulkland? Ah! my dear said she, I am
sorry you strive to catch at so slender a twig; you may be sure I am but
too well convinced that the letter is genuine, or you should never have
had a moment's uneasiness by the knowlege of it. Mr Faulkland himself
does not deny it, and it is with his permission that I kept it. I
promised to return it, but desired leave to retain it for a few days. He
could not refuse me this, though he might easily imagine I designed to
shew it to you. That, indeed, _was_ my intention, when I desired to keep
it a little while in my hands, and I did so, that I might have your
judgment on the letter itself, as well as fully to justify my own
proceedings in what I have done. Ah! dear madam, cry'd I, scarce knowing
what I said, I rely on your maternal goodness; I am sure you have done
what is proper. Yet has Mr Faulkland nothing to say for himself?--But I
will ask no more questions--I know too much already--My love, said my
mother, you have a right to know every thing relative to this affair.
I shewed the letters to your brother, as soon as I received them. Sir
George at first seemed quite confounded, but afterwards, to my very
great surprize, he smiled, and said, he knew of that foolish business
before. I asked him, if he knew of it before, how he could answer it to
his honour, his conscience, or the love he ought to bear his sister, not
to divulge it immediately? Why, said he, I assure you it is a _trivial_
affair, that ought not to make you uneasy.
What, George! I answered I, a trivial matter for a man to ruin a fine
young lady, forsake her, and dare to involve an innocent creature in his
crimes! Do you call this a _trivial_ affair? If you knew the
_circumstances_, said he, you would not view it in so disadvantageous a
light. Faulkland certainly gained the affections of a young lady, though
without seeking to do so; he never courted her, never attempted to
please her, much less to win her heart, and least of all to ruin her
virtue. I know that is an action he is not capable of committing. How
comes it to pass then that he _did_ so, said I, interrupting him? Why,
the girl was silly, and she was thrown in his way by a vile designing
woman that had the care of her, 'And was he (again stopping him) to take
advantage of her folly, and join with that _vile designing_ woman, to
destroy a poor young creature's honour?' The _best_ men, said he
confidently, may fall into an error; and if you expect to find a man
entirely free from them, you look for what is not possible in human
nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account