Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family DocumentsBuckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
History
Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family Documents
Buckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
Great Britain -- History -- George IV, 1820-1830
Notwithstanding the great loss which we sustained last night from
the absence of poor Plunket, who set off for Ireland with little
hope of finding his wife alive, we made a very good figure last
night. Castlereagh spoke better than I ever heard him. You will see
that your suggestion of adding some words to exclude all mental
reservation is adopted--that is to say, both Phillimore and
Castlereagh last night stated the willingness of the promoters of
the Bill to admit them, if any person thought it desirable to move
their insertion. Burrell, notwithstanding what he had said, came
and voted against us; but Curteis and Fox Lane, instead of only
staying away, voted with us. Davies Gilbert did not vote, but is so
completely turned that I have strong hopes of his vote on Monday.
We are also to have Denman, and I believe Abraham Moore, from the
Circuits; W. Pole, who was ill; Dennis Browne, and Sir Gerard Noel,
who were absent. Castlereagh has also promised to insist on
checking the activity of Holmes, who has been quite indefatigable
in the use of every means, fair and foul, to induce members to vote
against us. Lord Fife has been dismissed from the Bedchamber, in
consequence of his vote on the Malt Tax, and Lord Lovaine is to
succeed him.
What passed on that occasion is only a confirmation of the truth of
the Duke of Wellington's view of the state of administration, and
of the hollowness of their support on any question which is not
vital. I suppose they now look to replace the Doctor and Van. by
Peel and Canning, who are evidently extremely disposed to return
together.
I agree with you in thinking the Bill, as it originally stood, with
the explanation of the oath, was preferable to its present form;
but _on fait ce qu'on peut_ and _non ce qu'on veut_. The best way
of all would be to make the oath now proposed general for
Protestants and Catholics, but this, I fear, is impossible.
I fear that we shall be all Monday on the question of admissibility
to Parliament, and must reserve the Privy Council and the Judges
for Tuesday.
It is intended to add the second Bill in the shape of clauses to
the first. I suppose we can hardly hope to carry it up to your
House till Monday, the 2nd. As to the affairs of the South, my view
very closely concurs with yours.
I will make some inquiry about the office of Lord Chancellor of
Ireland before I again write; but I do not myself feel any alarm at
the exercise of visitatorial or any other power _in curia_ by a
Catholic, and think, indeed, it might more safely be lodged in his
hands than in those of an Unitarian or bigoted Presbyterian, who
might both now hold it.
Believe me, ever most truly yours,
C. WILLIAMS WYNN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account