Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family DocumentsBuckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
History
Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family Documents
Buckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
Great Britain -- History -- George IV, 1820-1830
More than one communication printed in this volume has indicated that
the Government were anxious to secure the services of the leading
members of the Grenville party. It will be seen that the former became
more and more conscious of the desirableness of such a junction.
THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON TO THE MARQUIS OF BUCKINGHAM.
London, March 27, 1821.
MY DEAR LORD BUCKINGHAM,
I have received your letter; and you may rely upon it, that there
is no man more desirous than I am of strengthening the connexion
between your family and the Government. I think that the services
which you have, upon principle, rendered to them are of a nature to
give you every claim to their consideration; and I am very much
mistaken if this feeling is not common to all those at present
forming the Administration.
I shall be very happy in being instrumental in forwarding any wish
of yours; and I will so conduct myself as not to involve you in
anything.
Believe me, ever yours most sincerely,
WELLINGTON.
DR. PHILLIMORE TO THE MARQUIS OF BUCKINGHAM.
Doctors' Commons, March 29, 1821.
MY DEAR LORD,
I should have sent your Lordship yesterday the result of Tuesday's
debate, but that I was shut up all the morning with Sir John
Newport _and Co._, on the subject of the clauses relating to the
securities. You will perceive that several inaccuracies are
corrected; and amongst other amendments, I believe most of the
alterations you suggested have been introduced--all, at least, that
we considered, under existing circumstances, to be advisable.
We got through all the clauses last night, upon the whole, very
triumphantly; but Mr. Hutchinson opened a broadside upon us, which
in the earlier stages of the Bill might have sunk the whole
concern--inasmuch as he characterized the second Bill (now
consolidated with the first) as a Bill of pains, penalties,
degradation, &c., imposed on the Roman Catholic clergy. The attack,
however, recoiled upon the promoter of it, and the discussion was
so conducted as to assist the Bill. The debate is exceedingly ill
given in all the papers I have seen, more especially as it omits
the speeches of three Irish county members, who rose in succession,
and said they had every reason to believe the measure was very
agreeable to the Roman Catholics in the counties they
represented--Butler, the member for the county of Kilkenny (which,
I believe, is intensely Catholic), being one. None of the
Opposition ultras would attend last night.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account